Pressure Calculations through Volume Differences

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of creating pressure in water by utilizing the volume difference from releasing waters of hydration in hydrates. It highlights a contradiction in the idea that the contents can exceed the fixed volume of a container to generate pressure. Participants clarify that while water is compressible to some extent, the pressure required for significant compression exceeds what typical containers can handle. They suggest that the concept may need clearer communication and additional context to assess its practicality. Overall, the method of using hydration release for pressurization appears impractical without further details.
EthanSchrag
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Recently I've been researching the pressurization of water through the releasing of the waters of hydration in hydrates. The goal is to create a volume difference inside a container of fixed volume, basically the volume of the contents should be greater than the volume of the container in order to create pressure. Mathematically this works out and theoretically you can get a volume of 113.21ml from 100ml of a hydrate. But i don't know what to do with these numbers. I want an overall pressure and I'm assuming you can get one from them but i don't know exactly how to calculate it (Is this kind of pressurization of water even possible?). Help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
Is this kind of pressurization of water even possible?
You realize that the statement " volume difference inside a container of fixed volume" is a contradiction and " the volume of the contents should be greater than the volume of the container in order to create pressure" does not make sense.
... you seem to want to force more water into an existing volume than the volume can contain, ie. increasing the density of the contained water?
So the short answer is "no". Though the water may contain something else that is more compressible.
However, it could be that you are just not communicating clearly - can you provide a reference for the process you want to study?
 
Every form of matter has sub-atomic space that can be compressed to a greater density. Water is no exception but the pressure required would likely be greater than a fixed size container can structurally withstand. For all practical purposes water cannot be compressed.
 
Well, sending ultrasound through water is a practical enough purpose.
If water weren't compressible there would be no longitudinal sound waves in it.

The compressibility of water is much higher than that of steel or aluminum. However I never seen someone saying that steel cannot be compressed (even if only "for all practical purposes").
Why is water so special? :)
 
Not sure that "releasing waters of hydration" would be a useful method either... high pressure water is used in water cooled nuclear reactors where, one could argue, the water in the pipes would otherwise occupy a larger volume (as steam). I think we need details.

Also see ie.
http://water.usgs.gov/edu/compressibility.html
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top