Pressure Difference: Why Ignored at P1 & P2 in Energy Eqn?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the treatment of pressure differences at points P1 and P2 in the context of Bernoulli's equation for incompressible fluids. Participants clarify that the author assumes equal pressure at both points due to their selection of surface height values, which leads to the cancellation of pressure terms in the energy equation. The confusion arises from the dimensional differences between pressure and energy, and the necessity of dividing by ρg to simplify the equation. Ultimately, the conclusion is that the pressure difference is ignored because the chosen points are at the same elevation, resulting in equal pressures.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bernoulli's equation and its application to fluid dynamics.
  • Familiarity with the concept of incompressible fluids.
  • Knowledge of potential energy terms in fluid mechanics.
  • Basic grasp of dimensional analysis in physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Bernoulli's equation in fluid mechanics.
  • Learn about the implications of pressure differences in fluid flow scenarios.
  • Explore the concept of hydrostatic pressure and its role in fluid statics.
  • Investigate the effects of elevation changes on pressure in fluid systems.
USEFUL FOR

Students of fluid mechanics, engineers working with fluid systems, and anyone seeking to understand the principles of energy conservation in incompressible fluid flow.

foo9008
Messages
676
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


why the author ignore the pressure difference at point 1 and point 2 in the energy equation ?pressure at pont 1 must be higher than pressure 2 , right ? as the height of P1 is higher

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
notes attached here
 

Attachments

  • 100.PNG
    100.PNG
    5.9 KB · Views: 424
  • 101.PNG
    101.PNG
    7 KB · Views: 414
  • 102.PNG
    102.PNG
    5.8 KB · Views: 403
foo9008 said:

Homework Statement


why the author ignore the pressure difference at point 1 and point 2 in the energy equation ?pressure at pont 1 must be higher than pressure 2 , right ? as the height of P1 is higher
Pressure and energy are dimensionally different. How would you propose to take pressure into account for an energy equation involving incompressible fluid?
 
haruspex said:
Pressure and energy are dimensionally different. How would you propose to take pressure into account for an energy equation involving incompressible fluid?
sorry , why the author did not take the P/ y into the calculation ? where y = ρg
 
foo9008 said:
sorry , why the author did not take the P/ y into the calculation ? where y = ρg
The 2+ and 1+ are the potential energy terms. It is a bit confusing because the author has divided out ρg everywhere.
 
haruspex said:
The 2+ and 1+ are the potential energy terms. It is a bit confusing because the author has divided out ρg everywhere.
after dividing the ρg why there is no P to be taken into the calculation ? the author assume P1 and P2 as same pressure? why ?
 
foo9008 said:
after dividing the ρg why there is no P to be taken into the calculation ? the author assume P1 and P2 as same pressure? why ?
Bernoulli's equation refers to identified points in the streamline. The author's choice of height values (1, 2) indicates the points being chosen are on the surface, so the pressure is the same. If instead you pick points at the bottom of the stream then the heights are the same and the pressures are different, but the equation turns out the same.
 
haruspex said:
Bernoulli's equation refers to identified points in the streamline. The author's choice of height values (1, 2) indicates the points being chosen are on the surface, so the pressure is the same. If instead you pick points at the bottom of the stream then the heights are the same and the pressures are different, but the equation turns out the same.
so do you mean the author choose point 1 and2 on the surface??
 
foo9008 said:
so do you mean the author choose point 1 and2 on the surface??
It seems that way.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: foo9008

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
787
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
827
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K