Pressure in Seepage: Why Is It (H1 + z + (h/H2)(z))(y_w)?
- Thread starter fonseh
- Start date
Click For Summary
Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the calculation of pore pressure in a seepage context, specifically examining the formula for pore pressure at a point C in relation to hydrostatic pressure and contributions from seepage flow. The scope includes theoretical aspects and mathematical reasoning related to fluid mechanics in porous media.
Discussion Character
- Technical explanation
- Mathematical reasoning
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- Some participants question the formula for pore pressure at point C, suggesting it should only include the hydrostatic component without the seepage contribution.
- Others explain that the total pore pressure at C includes both hydrostatic pressure and an additional contribution from seepage flow, expressed as ##\frac{h}{H_2}z\gamma_w##.
- A participant raises a scenario involving downward seepage, questioning why the pressure at point B is expressed differently and whether it should increase with depth.
- Some participants clarify that while hydrostatic pressure increases with depth, the contribution from downward seepage involves a pressure gradient that affects the overall pressure distribution.
- There is a discussion about the relationship between pressures at points A, C, and B in the context of downward seepage, with some asserting that pressure decreases from A to B.
- Participants inquire about the term ##\frac{k}{\mu}vz## and its significance in the context of seepage pressure, with one mentioning that it relates to Darcy's Law.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on the contributions of hydrostatic pressure and seepage to total pore pressure, with no consensus reached on the correct interpretation of pressure variations in the context of downward seepage.
Contextual Notes
Some assumptions regarding the conditions of seepage flow and the definitions of terms used in the equations are not fully articulated, leaving room for interpretation and potential ambiguity in the mathematical relationships discussed.
Similar threads
- · Replies 1 ·
- · Replies 9 ·
- · Replies 1 ·
- · Replies 2 ·
- · Replies 19 ·
- · Replies 15 ·
- · Replies 1 ·