Pressure of gases in a container

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between gas pressure in a container and Le Chatelier's principle. It highlights that an increase in pressure can lead to a shift in equilibrium, potentially reducing the number of gas molecules and affecting their mass. However, the pressure exerted by gases is primarily determined by the translational energy of the molecules rather than their mass alone. An increase in molecular mass may lead to a decrease in translational kinetic energy, which can lower the overall pressure. The complexities of these interactions suggest that the behavior of gases under pressure is not straightforward and depends on various factors within the system.
mikkol
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello,
my tutor told me the answer to this questions went beyond the scope of the course.

We are taught that according to Le Chatelier principle, a system at equilibrium compensates a changement of pressure by shifting towards products or reactants and thus changing the number of molecules in the system. So, a pressure's increase is compensated by a reduction of the number of molecules in the system, shifting the equilibrium towards more massive molecules. A reduced number of more massive molecules should exert on the container's walls the same overall pressure than a larger number of less massive molecules, so nullifying the system's shift. So why is that not the case?

Besides, we are also taught that pressure exerted by gases on a container's wall depends on the number of molecules hitting the walls. The Pascal, pressure's SI unit, is defined as N x m-2 , so kg m-1 s-2. Therefore, pressure should also depend on the mass of the molecules colliding with the container's walls?

Best wishes
Nick
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mikkol said:
Hello,
my tutor told me the answer to this questions went beyond the scope of the course.

We are taught that according to Le Chatelier principle, a system at equilibrium compensates a changement of pressure by shifting towards products or reactants and thus changing the number of molecules in the system. So, a pressure's increase is compensated by a reduction of the number of molecules in the system, shifting the equilibrium towards more massive molecules. A reduced number of more massive molecules should exert on the container's walls the same overall pressure than a larger number of less massive molecules, so nullifying the system's shift. So why is that not the case?
Le Chatelier's principle is a little bit like Occam's Razor. It is a general observation but it is not a physical law.

There are various ways that an increase in pressure in a system at equilibrium will cause a system to reduce pressure. It depends on the system. For example, an increase in pressure may reduce the rate of one reaction, which may reduce the temperature or the number of gas molecules, and thereby reduce pressure.

Besides, we are also taught that pressure exerted by gases on a container's wall depends on the number of molecules hitting the walls. The Pascal, pressure's SI unit, is defined as N x m-2 , so kg m-1 s-2. Therefore, pressure should also depend on the mass of the molecules colliding with the container's walls?
Not necessarily. The pressure is determined by the translational energy of the molecules. If you increase the mass of the molecules you may also increase the number of degrees of freedom of the molecules and, thereby, decrease the translational kinetic energy of the molecules at a given temperature and decrease the pressure as a result.

AM
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top