Pressure to Force to Mass with English units

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the mass in pound-mass (lbm) from a pressure measurement of 3000 atm using a dead-weight gauge. The user correctly calculated the force exerted by the piston but confused the units, leading to an incorrect mass result. The correct approach involves recognizing that the force in lbf is equivalent to lbm under standard gravity, but the user mistakenly converted to slugs. The discrepancy in the final answer is attributed to rounding and unit conversion errors. Clarification on the use of gravitational constants in the English system is also sought.
PassatDream
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A pressure of 3000atm is measured with a dead-weight gauge. The piston diameter is 0.17in. What is the mass in pound-mass (lbm)?

Homework Equations


1) P=F/A
2) F=PA
3) F=mg
4) F/g=m

The Attempt at a Solution



I first used the given diameter to find the cross-sectional area of the piston:
A = (\frac{\pi}{4})(0.17 in^{2}) = 0.023 in^{2}

Then I plugged the newly-found A into eqn. 2 with the given P value plus a conversion factor (atm->psi).

F = (3000atm)(\frac{14.69595 psi}{1 atm})(0.023in^{2})

F= 1014.02 lbf

I then used my F value and plugged it into eqn. 4 and used the standard gravitational value (32.174 ft/s^2)for g.

So,

m = \frac{1014.02lbf}{32.174\frac{ft lbm}{lbf s^{2}}} = 31.52 lbm

However, this is not the answer given in the back of the book, which is 1000.7 lbm. Can someone tell me where I'm going wrong? I'm assuming it's with my application of the grav. constant, since I still don't really understand it's use in the English system. TIA.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You converted your answer to slugs, not lbm. Personally, I loathe the idea of lbm. In practical use - although not entirely correct - lbf is equivalent to lbm. So, your original numerical answer of 1014 is correct - just different due to rounding in between steps.
 
slugs!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top