Prevent Pendulum Motion with Winch & Cable

AI Thread Summary
To prevent pendulum motion when lowering an object with a winch and cable, several methods can be employed. Attaching a cable to both ends of the object or using a shaft mechanism similar to an elevator can help stabilize the load. Implementing a vertical guide wire, tensioned between two points, allows for better control of the object's movement. Additionally, rapidly adjusting the suspension point can correct for any unwanted motion. These techniques can effectively minimize pendulum motion during lowering operations.
ryanbe
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi Clever People,

Is there any method or gyro to prevent pendulum motion of an object when lowering it using a cable and a winch? I am doing a home projects and the motion is a big problem.

Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could attach a cable to both ends of the object, or attach it to a shaft, like an elevator.
 
You can also use a vertical guide wire, which is tensioned between top and bottom, and the load is attached to it using something like a bow shackle which can easily slide.
 
Move the suspension point rapidly to correct for motion of the load?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top