Previously suppressed knowledge to control the masses

  • Thread starter Thread starter jake jot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Control Knowledge
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on historical examples of knowledge and technology that have been suppressed to maintain control over populations. Key examples include the suppression of scientific discoveries, such as Galileo's findings about Jupiter's moons, and the prohibition of literacy among marginalized groups, which highlights the foundational role of written language. The conversation also touches on modern examples like the concealment of nuclear weapon knowledge to prevent global destruction. The motivations behind such suppression are explored, including the desire for political power, financial gain, and the maintenance of existing paradigms. The idea is that successful suppression often requires significant societal effort and targets isolated segments of the population.
jake jot
Messages
302
Reaction score
17
I need in my story some examples of previous knowledges or technology that were once kept suppressed in order to control the masses. For example. Flour (to keep people dependent on fruits or vegetables or produce)? Electricity? concept of Pressure? What can you think of? In modern times, knowledges of nuclear weapons were kept suppressed to avoid global annihilation. But at least we understood concepts of it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jake jot said:
I need in my story some examples of previous knowledges or technology that were once kept suppressed in order to control the masses. For example. Flour (to keep people dependent on fruits or vegetables or produce)? Electricity? concept of Pressure? What can you think of? In modern times, knowledges of nuclear weapons were kept suppressed to avoid global annihilation. But at least we understood concepts of it.
Galileo discovered that Jupiter had moons. He was placed under house arrest.
 
As I recall US history, there were many places where teaching a "colored" person to read was illegal. Written language is a foundational technology.

🗽
 
What else? Besides nuclear weapons?

Were there any medical doctors in the past who were burnt at the stakes? Or scientists?
 
<Post edited by mentor to remove unsupported allegations that are not germane to this thread.>

Suppression of information should have some kind of benefit to the perpetrator to drive that action. I think would have to be a big effort (involving large numbers of people in society), to be successful.
Targetting a communicationally isolated fraction of a society would be easier.
  • Money (as in proprietary)
  • Political power
  • Power over another person
  • Entrenching a point of view (opposing paradigmatic change, like Copernicus)
Are the reasons I could quickly think of that would seem to be strong enough to generate the activity of large numbers of people to take action.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm currently writing a novel in which my main character was a victim of experimentation (cliche, I know) but has no memory of it. In the experimentation, technology was implanted in the character's body, allowing an AI algorithm to run off of the character and fuse it's psychological aspects with an actual human's. I'm not super knowledgeable in science such as this, and I'm sure doing this would be incredibly hard, if not impossible, to do. So for the sake of keeping the peace, let's just...
This is a question for people who know about astrophysics. It's been said that the habitable zones around red dwarf stars are so close to those stars that any planets in the zones would be tidally locked to the stars in question. With one side roasting and another side freezing almost forever, those planets wouldn't be hospitable to life. a) Could there be forms of life--whole ecologies--that first evolve in the planet's twilight zone and then extend their habitat by burrowing...
I know this topic is extremely contraversial and debated, but I'm writing a book where an AI attempts to become as human as possible. Would it, eventually, especially in the far future, be possible for an AI to gain a conscious? To be clear, my definition of a consciousness being the ability to possess self-created morals, thoughts, and views, AKA a whole personality. And if this is possible (and let's just say it is for this question), about how long may it take for something to happen...

Similar threads

Replies
28
Views
5K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top