Primer on conformal / dual conformal symmetry

  • Thread starter Thread starter earth2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dual Symmetry
earth2
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

i am looking for some primer on conformal, dual conformal symmetry, respectively. I have to read a lot of stuff about scattering amplitudes for uni and in recent papers people talk a lot about these symmetries... unfortunately i am not so familiar with them, so does any of you know a good reference for studying them (lecture notes or whatever)?

Thanks!
earth2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For conformal theories you could consult the text of DiFrancesco et. al. It's the standard work on the subject and doesn't need a lot of prerequisites.
 
There are a plethora of papers on the subject. Some of the first few that helped me out were Drummond's (http://arxiv.org/abs/0807.1095) and Berkovits and Maldacena's (http://arxiv.org/abs/0807.3196). Generally, all of the papers by Drummond in the past few years have been about this topic (http://arxiv.org/find/hep-th/1/au:+Drummond_J/0/1/0/all/0/1). Maldacena has been involved in this game from the AdS/CFT side, exploring the connection between amplitudes and Wilson loops, which involves the connection between the conformal and dual conformal groups. Arkani-Hamed et al have been studying N=4 SYM for the past two or so years, and have written down a formula for tree amplitudes as integrals over a geometric structure known as the Grassmannian that is manifestly Yangian-invariant. Drummond talks at length about the Yangian in some of his papers; the basic idea is if something is invariant under the superconformal AND dual superconformal algebras, it must be invariant under a full (infinite-dimensional) algebra known as the Yangian of the superconformal algebra.

If you want to get a more physical understanding of the presence of the dual conformal symmetry in physics, I'd suggest you start by learning about the amplitudes/Wilson loop connection.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You'll eventually also want to study momentum twistors since they're very useful for all of this.
http://arxiv.org/abs/0909.0250

That's not a particularly easy paper to follow, you might find some better ones. There's plenty of papers on these things, your best bet is to just look through as many as you can and see which you like best.

I was actually just looking through this PhD thesis of Henn's, maybe it's useful
http://arxiv.org/abs/0903.0522
 
How could I forget about Mason and Skinner? Sigh.

As far as twistors themselves go, Witten gives a decent introduction to them in (http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0312171). In my opinion, M&S gives a pretty decent introduction to momentum twistors.
 
Alright, thank you all! Now i have plenty to read :)
 
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
Back
Top