Principles Of Mathematical Analysis-Walter Rudin

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Shaji D R
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mathematical
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on Chapter 8, Equation 28 of "Principles of Mathematical Analysis" by Walter Rudin, specifically addressing the interchange of limits as h approaches 0 and n approaches infinity. The participants confirm that Theorem 7.11 is relevant for proving the interchangeability of limits, although it is noted that Theorem 8.1 suffices as it establishes the continuity of the series involved. The limit of the series is shown to converge uniformly within a neighborhood of zero, leading to the conclusion that the limit can be taken as h approaches 0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in calculus
  • Familiarity with power series and their convergence
  • Knowledge of Theorems 7.11 and 8.1 from Rudin's text
  • Basic concepts of continuity in mathematical analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Theorem 7.11 in detail
  • Review Theorem 8.1 and its application to complex power series
  • Explore uniform convergence and its significance in analysis
  • Practice problems involving limits and series from "Principles of Mathematical Analysis"
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematical analysis, particularly those studying real analysis and seeking clarity on limit interchangeability and series convergence in Rudin's framework.

Shaji D R
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I am reading Principles Of Mathematical Analysis by Walter Rudin.
Chapter 8, Equation 28 needs some clarification.

We are taking a lim as h->0 on a series. Value of series is lim as n->INF on the squence of partial
sums. So first we take lim as n->INF on a sequence of partial sums and then we are taking
lim as h->0. But can we interchange the order of limits. If so result is immediate.

But how to prove that we can change the order of limits? Is it that we have to use Thearem 7.11?

Please help me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct. You need to use theorem 7.11. Rudin likes to leave gaps like this for the reader to fill in, which can be annoying sometimes. Here is a detailed explanation. I assume you are OK with the first equality:
$$\lim_{h \rightarrow 0} \frac{E(z+h) - E(z)}{h} = E(z) \lim_{h \rightarrow 0} \frac{E(h) - 1}{h}$$
As Rudin indicates, this follows directly from ##E(z+h) = E(z)E(h)## and doesn't require interchanging any limits. So consider this limit
$$\lim_{h \rightarrow 0} \frac{E(h) - 1}{h}$$
By definition, we have
$$E(h) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{h^n}{n!}$$
and the ratio test shows that this series converges absolutely for all ##h##. Therefore
$$\begin{align}
\frac{E(h) - 1}{h} &= \frac{1}{h} \left(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{h^n}{n!} - 1\right) \\
&= \frac{1}{h}\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{h^n}{n!}\\
&= \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{h^n}{(n+1)!} \\
&= 1 + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{h^n}{(n+1)!}
\end{align}$$
Let
$$S(h) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{h^n}{(n+1)!}$$
We're interested in what happens as ##h \rightarrow 0##, so we may restrict our attention to a neighborhood of zero, say ##B_{\epsilon}(0)##. Since we are dealing with a power series, the convergence is uniform on ##B_{\epsilon}(0)##, by theorem 8.1. [Technically you need to reprove theorem 8.1 for complex power series, but the proof is exactly the same.] Thus ##S## is continuous on ##B_{\epsilon}(0)##, by theorem 7.11. Therefore
$$\lim_{h \rightarrow 0}S(h) = S(0)$$ and the result follows.

[edit]: Actually you can dispense with theorem 7.11, because his theorem 8.1 includes the result that ##S## is continuous within the radius of convergence.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K