A Probability and entropy in an exponentially increasing sample space

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the relationship between probability and information entropy in an exponentially increasing sample space. A new forum member expressed interest in sharing their formulation on this topic but was cautious about the forum's rules regarding personal theories. Despite clarification that their work is based on statistical theory, the member was advised that non-mainstream theories are generally not permitted. Ultimately, the member attempted to post their paper, which was subsequently deleted, leading to the closure of the thread. The forum emphasizes adherence to established scientific discourse and discourages speculative theories.
Larry Lacey
Messages
17
Reaction score
6
TL;DR Summary
Relationship between probability and entropy in an exponentially increasing sample space
Hi, I'm new to PF and not really sure which forum may be the most appropriate to find people with an interest in probability and entropy. But the title of this forum looks promising. If you share an interest in this topic would be delighted to hear from you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have a question?
 
Yes mathman, has anyone come across a formulation for the relationship between probability and informaton entropy in an exponentially increasing sample space?
 
I believe I have such a formulation. How is that best shared on this forum or is this not something that should be done?
 
There is no reason not to. Just make sure that your terms are clearly defined.
 
Thanks for the feedback mathman. For me to do this, it would be best for me to present this as a pdf file, ie as an attachment. Will that be OK? Don't want to be presumptive.
 
Larry Lacey said:
Thanks for the feedback mathman. For me to do this, it would be best for me to present this as a pdf file, ie as an attachment. Will that be OK? Don't want to be presumptive.
This is not the place to discuss personal or speculative theories. If you post your theory, it will likely be deleted.
 
It's not a theory PeroK. It is a framework constructed using statistical theory. It could be flawed but that is for others to argue based on statistical theory. However, I will not post it until I get an OK to do so, as I'm new to the forum and ts rules.
 
Larry Lacey said:
It's not a theory PeroK. It is a framework constructed using statistical theory. It could be flawed but that is for others to argue based on statistical theory. However, I will not post it until I get an OK to do so, as I'm new to the forum and ts rules.
Here's the relevant rule:

Non-mainstream theories:
Generally, in the forums we do not allow the following:
  • Discussion of theories that appear only on personal web sites, self-published books, etc.
  • Challenges to mainstream theories (relativity, the Big Bang, etc.) that go beyond current professional discussion
  • Attempts to promote or resuscitate theories that have been discredited or superseded (e.g. Lorentz ether theory); this does not exclude discussion of those theories in a purely historical context
  • Personal theories or speculations that go beyond or counter to generally-accepted science
  • Mixing science and religion, e.g. using religious doctrines in support of scientific arguments or vice versa.
  • Philosophical discussions are permitted only at the discretion of the mentors and may be deleted or closed without warning or appeal
 
  • #10
PeroK said:
This is not the place to discuss personal or speculative theories. If you post your theory, it will likely be deleted.
OP tried posting his paper anyway, and it has indeed been deleted. Thread is closed.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50 and PeroK
Back
Top