Probability and Statistic on Infinite-Dimensional spaces

lokofer
Messages
104
Reaction score
0
Probability and Statistic on "Infinite-Dimensional" spaces

Hello..can the theories of Probability and Statistic be generalized to "Infinite-dimensional" spaces?..i mean if there are "probabilistic" phenomenon that include an infinite number of random variables, or include "random functions" instead of random numbers, or if you can define the probabilistic n-th "momentum" of a distribution in the sense of the functional integral:

\int D[\phi ]\phi^{n} P[\phi]= < \phi ^{n} >

By the way..if Montecarlo integration does not depend on the dimensionality of space.. why can't you perform infinite dimensional integrals...? simply in the form:

\int D[\phi ]\phi^{n} P[\phi]= \sum_{i} P[ \phi _i ] \phi_{i}^{n} + \sum_{r}a(r) \delta ^{r}\phi^{n} P[\phi]

Or something similar...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you can put a probability measure on it, you can do statistics. No need to "generalize".
 
The problem is that you can't find any "Infinite dimensional " meassure... unless perhaps that if you have a 1-dimensional meassure you take:

\sum_{i}^{\infty} \mu _{i} \prod _{i}^{\infty} \mu _{i}

sum or product of known meassures... the problem of "probabilistic meassures" for Feynman Path Integral is one of the unsolved problems in Theoretical Physics...
 
What do you mean 'you can't find any "infinite dimensional" measure'? There are standard measures on Hilbert and Banach spaces.
 
I don't see any theoretical problem with taking an infinite product measure. (that doesn't mean none exists...) There is a practical problem, though -- too many interesting sets have infinite measure, or zero measure. E.g. the measure of a cube is:

0 (if the side length is less than 1)
1 (if the side length equals 1)
+infinity (if the side length is greater than 1)
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top