Probability doubt - where am i wrong?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jd12345
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Doubt Probability
jd12345
Messages
251
Reaction score
2
There is a dice where probability of obtaining a number is proportional to the number itself.
I have done these problems and the probabilties are 1/21, 2/21,/3/21,/4/21,/5/21 and 6/21

In a normal dice when you have to find probabilities of say, 2 and 4 we do it by favourable cases / total number of cases = 2/6 = 1/3

But you can't apply that method in this case - i know that but why?

Probability of 2 or 4 in this case would be 2/21 + 4/21 = 6/21
but why can't we do this by favourable cases / total number of cases?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi jd12345! :smile:
jd12345 said:
… but why can't we do this by favourable cases / total number of cases?

that formula only applies when each case is equally likely :wink:
 
Check the three drawbacks of "Classical" definition.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Back
Top