Probability help/sigma-algebras

  • Thread starter Thread starter FTaylor244
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
FTaylor244
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Let (S, ε, P) be a probability space and let A be an element of ε with P(A)>0. Let F={AπE :E is an element of ε }
-Prove that F is a sigma-algebra on A.



Not sure even where to go with this really. I know that to be a sigma-algebra has to be closed under complementation and countable unions. I'm not very good with proofs, and just a push in the right direction would help me out a ton. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So you will need to show that:

- A is in F
- The complement of A cap E is in F
- A countable union U_i A cap E_i is in F.

All you need to know are the properties of sets and that epsilon is a sigma algebra. Try it and show what you have tried.
 
Oh, I was under the impression I had to do it the other way around, such that F is in A, etc..maybe that's why I'm having such a hard time here.

Ok so...

A is in F because F=A intersect E, and since an intersect of A is in F, then all of A has to be in F (not sure how to write this properly)
F=AnE is the same as F=(A^c U E^c)^c (^c=complement)
not really sure how to go about the last one
 
FTaylor244 said:
A is in F because F=A intersect E, and since an intersect of A is in F, then all of A has to be in F (not sure how to write this properly)
F=AnE is the same as F=(A^c U E^c)^c (^c=complement)
not really sure how to go about the last one

F is a set of subsets of A, namely the set of A cap E for E in the sigma algebra. Check the definition of a sigma algebra. Try again keeping that in mind.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top