MHB Probability of event modelled by poisson happening twice, consecutively

AI Thread Summary
To find the probability of receiving at least three telephone calls in two successive one-minute intervals modeled by a Poisson distribution with a mean of 3.5, first calculate the probability of receiving at least three calls in one minute. This can be done using the cumulative distribution function of the Poisson distribution. Once the probability for one minute is determined, it can be squared to find the probability for two successive intervals, as the events are independent. Therefore, the final probability is the square of the individual probability for at least three calls in one minute. Understanding the independence of the intervals is key to solving this problem correctly.
cmkluza
Messages
118
Reaction score
1
I'm not great at statistics, so I don't know where to start with this problem. It is stated as follows:

The number of telephone calls, T, received each minute can be modeled by a Poisson distribution with a mean of 3.5.

Find the probability that at least three telephone calls are received in each of two successive one-minute intervals.

So, I understand we have T ~ Po(3.5), and using a calculator or formula, I could easily identify the probability of having at least three telephone calls, but I don't understand what to do about that two successive part. Been thinking on this one for a while, but I'm at a loss as to what to do. Can anyone give me any suggestions on how to think about this to arrive at an answer?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You could multiply the probability of atleast 3 successive calls twice i.e P($$\ge$$ 3 phone calls) x P($$\ge$$ 3 phone calls), since our event gets completed only if we consider both of it's elements(in this case, the number of calls in two successive minutes).

This is just my suggestion as I, myself, am certainly not an ace in the area of statistics.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top