Probability of finding all 5 errors in a text with 3 people?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the probability of three proofreaders finding all five errors in a text, given their individual probabilities of detecting an error. It highlights the complexity of considering various combinations of error detection among the proofreaders. The initial approach involved calculating multiple scenarios and summing their probabilities, but this was deemed overly complicated. The simpler solution involves calculating the probability of none of the proofreaders finding an error and subtracting that from one, then raising the result to the fifth power for all errors. This method leads to the conclusion that the probability of at least one proofreader finding all errors is 0.74.
TheSodesa
Messages
224
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


There are 5 errors, and 3 people are proofreading the text.

  • P(1. person finds an error) = 0,5
  • P(2. person finds an error) = 0,6
  • P(3. person finds an error) = 0,7
There are 5 errors, and whenever a person comes across one, they have the above probability of seeing it. Depending on the combinations, the probabilities are multiplied together. The question implies that the probabilities are not dependent on each other.

Homework Equations



P(A and B) = P(A) * P(B)

The Attempt at a Solution



Now, my head is telling me, that there are a huge number of ways (combinations) the people could find the errors in. e.g.:

  1. Person 1 finds all errors, the other 2 find none. (0,5^5 * 0,4^5 * 0,3^5)
  2. Person 1 finds 3, person 2 finds 1 and person 3 finds 1. ((0,5^3 * 0,5^2 ) * (0,6 * 0,4^4 ) * (0,7 * 0,3^4 )
  3. Person 1 finds none, person 2 finds 3 and person 3 finds 2. (0,5^5 * (0,6^3 * 0,4^2 ) * (0,7^2 * 0,3^3 ))
  4. All people find all errors. (= 0,5^5 * 0,6^5 * 0,7^5 )
I know how to calculate combinations, but do I really have to go through all the possibilities and add the probabilities together. Are you even supposed to sum them up?

There is also the issue of possibly having to consider the order in which the errors are found in, but I very much doubt that is required. That would probably really bloat the answer to unreasonable proportions, and I wouldn't know if that's even possible mathematically.

For the record, the answer at the back of the book is 0,74. This leads me to think that addition is necessary, since probabilities are always 0 <= P <= 1 and the largest probability of finding an error is less than the answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Forget it. Turns out it was a simple solution after all. Got help from another forum, and I can't believe i didn't see the solution right away.

Just calculate the probability of none of the reviewers finding an error as they come across it, and the reduce that from 1 to get the probability of at least one of them finding it. Then just raise that to the 5th power to extend the probability to all 5 errors.
 
It's like the chance of throwing a six with six dice (you'd be surprised at the number of people who go from 1/6, 2/6, 3/6 to 6/6 if you bring it to them gradually).
 
Back
Top