MHB Probability of Male Picking Wife as Dance Partner

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the probability that at least one male at a party of six married couples chooses his own wife as a dance partner. Participants share their methods for solving the problem, with one user expressing satisfaction at discovering a more efficient approach. The complexity of the problem is acknowledged, indicating that it can be challenging to arrive at the correct solution. The conversation highlights the collaborative nature of problem-solving in mathematical discussions. Overall, the focus remains on the probability calculation related to the dance partner selection.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
There are 6 married couples (12 people) in a party. If every male has to pick a female as his dancing partner, find the probability that at least one male pick his own wife as his dancing partner.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello, anemone!

There are 6 married couples (12 people) in a party.
If every male has to pick a female as his dancing partner,
find the probability that at least one male picks his own wife
as his dancing partner.
There are $6! = 720$ possible outcomes.

If no man picks his own wife,
$\quad$ this is a derangement of 6 objects.
$d(6) \,=\,265$

$P(\text{no married couples}) \:=\:\dfrac{265}{720} \:=\:\dfrac{53}{144}$

Therefore: $\:P(\text{some married couples}) \;=\;1 - \dfrac{53}{144} \;=\;\dfrac{91}{144}$
 
soroban said:
Hello, anemone!


There are $6! = 720$ possible outcomes.

If no man picks his own wife,
$\quad$ this is a derangement of 6 objects.
$d(6) \,=\,265$

$P(\text{no married couples}) \:=\:\dfrac{265}{720} \:=\:\dfrac{53}{144}$

Therefore: $\:P(\text{some married couples}) \;=\;1 - \dfrac{53}{144} \;=\;\dfrac{91}{144}$

Well done, soroban! I solved this problem the very hard way, thus I'm happy to see this other approach to say the least.:o
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top