Probability of Selecting a Committee of 1 from Each Class

  • Thread starter Thread starter ArcanaNoir
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Combinations
ArcanaNoir
Messages
778
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



From a group of 3 freshman, 4 sophomores, 4 juniors, and 3 seniors, a committee of size 4 is randomly selected. Find the probability that the committee will consist of:

a) 1 from each class
b) 2 sophomores and 2 juniors
c) only sophomores and juniors

Homework Equations



How do you write "x choose n" in latex? For now I'll write (xCn)


The Attempt at a Solution



I figured there (14C4) different committees, giving 1001 committees.

a) [(3C1)(4C1)(4C1)(3C1)]/1001 = 144/1001

b) [(4C2)(4C2)]/1001 = 36/1001

c) 2/1001


Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How did you get c)? (it's wrong)
 
Hi ArcanaNoir! :smile:

(try using the X2 and X2 icons just above the Reply box … alternative nCm in latex is ^nC_m :wink:)

Your (a) and (b) look ok. :smile:

Your (c) is the answer for "only sophomores or only juniors". :redface:

(frankly, I don't know what (c) means … eg is 1 sophomore and 3 juniors sophomores ?)
 
tiny-tim said:
(frankly, I don't know what (c) means … eg is 1 sophomore and 3 juniors sophomores ?)

I agree. c) is poorly worded. I think the only condition is that no. sophomore >= 1 and no. junior >= 1, otherwise it's the same question as b), or 2 like the OP said.
 
Funny, I interpreted it as:
only from the group of all juniors and all sophomores.

So: no. sophomores ≥ 0 and no. juniors ≥ 0.
 
Last edited:
Hi I like Serena! :smile:

I think that's what it's meant to mean, but I don't think it's what it actually means! :biggrin:
 
Hi TM! :smile:

Errr... so 0 juniors and 4 sophomores, would qualify,
but 1 junior and 3 sophomores would not? :confused:
 
uhh? :confused:

0 isn't plural :wink:
 
zero apples isn't apples!

if you have zero apples, you don't have apples :redface:
 
  • #10
Okay.

So are you suggesting that c) could be interpreted as:
no. sophomores ≥ 2 and no. juniors ≥ 2?​
Or more strongly, that this is what it actually means?
 
Last edited:
  • #11
I like Serena said:
no. sophomores ≥ 2 and no. juniors ≥ 2?​


Or more strongly, that this is what it actually means?

Yup! :biggrin:
 
  • #12
Gee guys, if you had just waited.. C was supposed to be only sophomores OR only juniors. My prof's english is bad.
 
  • #13
Wait?!
And miss out on all the fun and conjecture?
Nah! :smile:

Anyway, I was kind of impressed to find out that "only sophomores and juniors" translates into "exactly 2 sophomores and 2 juniors".
Who'd have thunk! :wink:
 
Back
Top