Probability of stealing a base Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter aj1767
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Base Probability
aj1767
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have been grappling with this one for the past 24 hours.

I'll make this baseball related, consisting of three independent events assuming the following:
Player A has a 40% chance of stealing a base in "his game" tonight.
Player B has a 60% chance of stealing a base in "his game" tonight.
Player C has a 10% chance of stealing a base in "his game" tonight.

I want to figure out what the chances are that AT LEAST ONE of the three players will steal a base tonight. I originally thought the formula was P(AUBUC)=P(A)+P(B)+P(C)-P(A)*P(B)*P(C), but that gives me a final result of 1.076... a result higher than 100%. So that can't be it.

Can somebody help me out with this one?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The formula for three items should be written as:
P(A\cupB\cupC)=P(A) + P(B) + P(C) - P(A) P(B) - P(A) P(C) - P(B) P(C) + P(A) P(B) P(C) = 0.784
 
Another way to do it is this:

Let S represent the number of steals.

P(S>=1) =
1 - P(S<1) =
1 - P(S=0) =
1 - P(not A and not B and not C) =
1 - P(not A)*P(not B)*P(not C) <---- Because they are independent events.

Now, P(not A) = 1-.4 = .6, P(not B) = .4, P(not C) = .9

So, P(S>=1) = 0.784
 
Thank you both for your responses and thank you for helping me find out how to solve such problems. I like this second method since it is easier to expand to more events by simply adding more "P(not D), P(not E), etc."

Thanks again.

Pwantar said:
Another way to do it is this:

Let S represent the number of steals.

P(S>=1) =
1 - P(S<1) =
1 - P(S=0) =
1 - P(not A and not B and not C) =
1 - P(not A)*P(not B)*P(not C) <---- Because they are independent events.

Now, P(not A) = 1-.4 = .6, P(not B) = .4, P(not C) = .9

So, P(S>=1) = 0.784
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top