Probability of stealing a base Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter aj1767
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Base Probability
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the probability that at least one of three baseball players will steal a base, given their individual probabilities of success: Player A at 40%, Player B at 60%, and Player C at 10%. The initial formula attempted was incorrect, yielding a probability greater than 100%. The correct approach involves calculating the probability of none of the players stealing a base and subtracting that from 1, leading to a final probability of 0.784 for at least one successful steal. This method is noted for its ease of expansion to include more players. The conversation concludes with appreciation for the assistance in solving the problem.
aj1767
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have been grappling with this one for the past 24 hours.

I'll make this baseball related, consisting of three independent events assuming the following:
Player A has a 40% chance of stealing a base in "his game" tonight.
Player B has a 60% chance of stealing a base in "his game" tonight.
Player C has a 10% chance of stealing a base in "his game" tonight.

I want to figure out what the chances are that AT LEAST ONE of the three players will steal a base tonight. I originally thought the formula was P(AUBUC)=P(A)+P(B)+P(C)-P(A)*P(B)*P(C), but that gives me a final result of 1.076... a result higher than 100%. So that can't be it.

Can somebody help me out with this one?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The formula for three items should be written as:
P(A\cupB\cupC)=P(A) + P(B) + P(C) - P(A) P(B) - P(A) P(C) - P(B) P(C) + P(A) P(B) P(C) = 0.784
 
Another way to do it is this:

Let S represent the number of steals.

P(S>=1) =
1 - P(S<1) =
1 - P(S=0) =
1 - P(not A and not B and not C) =
1 - P(not A)*P(not B)*P(not C) <---- Because they are independent events.

Now, P(not A) = 1-.4 = .6, P(not B) = .4, P(not C) = .9

So, P(S>=1) = 0.784
 
Thank you both for your responses and thank you for helping me find out how to solve such problems. I like this second method since it is easier to expand to more events by simply adding more "P(not D), P(not E), etc."

Thanks again.

Pwantar said:
Another way to do it is this:

Let S represent the number of steals.

P(S>=1) =
1 - P(S<1) =
1 - P(S=0) =
1 - P(not A and not B and not C) =
1 - P(not A)*P(not B)*P(not C) <---- Because they are independent events.

Now, P(not A) = 1-.4 = .6, P(not B) = .4, P(not C) = .9

So, P(S>=1) = 0.784
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top