Probability question- picking marbles from a bag

  • Thread starter Thread starter Apollonian
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the probability of picking 3 red and 2 blue marbles from a total of 18 marbles (7 red, 5 blue, and 6 green). Initially, there was confusion regarding the number of marbles to be picked, with an incorrect mention of 5 marbles needing to include 3 of each color. Participants clarified that the correct scenario involves calculating the combinations of drawing 3 red and 2 blue marbles, emphasizing the importance of understanding permutations and combinations. The total number of combinations for drawing 5 marbles is calculated as 8568, and the probability of the desired outcome is derived by dividing the number of favorable outcomes by this total. The discussion highlights the complexity of probability calculations when order matters in specific contexts, despite the general principle that order does not matter in combinations.
Apollonian
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Pick 5 marbles from 7 red, 5 blue and 6 green. What is the probability of picking 3 red and 3 blue?
I'm hopeless with probability questions so any help would be fantastic.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
0, you are picking 5 marbles and you want 6: 3 red and 3 blue. It is impossible.
 
Apollonian said:
Pick 5 marbles ... probability of picking 3 red and 3 blue?

Incorrect question. Corrections can be
1. Pick 6 marbles.
2. 3 red OR 3 blue

And probability is just the game of guessing all possibilities and desired possibilities. Also, knowledge of Permutation and Combination and Set Theory (They helped me so far) can help in Probability.
 
My mistake, it was meant to be 3 red and 2 blue. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
 
Total number of marbles: 18
The probability of picking 3 red: \dfrac{7\cdot 6\cdot 5}{18\cdot 17\cdot 16}
Do you see how I got that? If you do, just do the same for the blues.
 
Millennial said:
Total number of marbles: 18
The probability of picking 3 red: \dfrac{7\cdot 6\cdot 5}{18\cdot 17\cdot 16}
Do you see how I got that? If you do, just do the same for the blues.

Of course, that would give the probability of RRRBB in that order; the OP would still need to find the probabilities of getting 3 red and 2 blue in other orders, such as RBBRR, BRBRR, etc.

RGV
 
For 5 draws, the sample space cardinality is |Ω|=18!/(5!13!)=8568 (this is the number of possible combinations of 5 marbles from 18 in total).

You then have to find the cardinality of the constrained Ω, where each state of the world is a drawing of 3 red balls and 2 blue balls. You then divide this number by 8568 and this will be your solution.
 
operationsres said:
For 5 draws, the sample space cardinality is |Ω|=18!/(5!13!)=8568 (this is the number of possible combinations of 5 marbles from 18 in total).

You then have to find the cardinality of the constrained Ω, where each state of the world is a drawing of 3 red balls and 2 blue balls. You then divide this number by 8568 and this will be your solution.

Ok I've been working on this for a few hours and concluded that this methodology is incorrect.

I don't think the sample space can be calculated by using the simple application of a permutation or combination formula. Order doesn't matter in the sense that {b1,b2,g1,g2,g3} is the same as {b2,b1,g1,g2,g3} but it does matter in the sense that {b1,g1,g2,g3,b2} is not the same as {b1,b2,g1,g2,g3}, which makes the problem quite challenging.

you also can't simply divide the cardinalities of both sample spaces because the probability of selecting an element from one set of members of a certain color is different to doing the same with another.
 
operationsres said:
Ok I've been working on this for a few hours and concluded that this methodology is incorrect.

I don't think the sample space can be calculated by using the simple application of a permutation or combination formula. Order doesn't matter in the sense that {b1,b2,g1,g2,g3} is the same as {b2,b1,g1,g2,g3} but it does matter in the sense that {b1,g1,g2,g3,b2} is not the same as {b1,b2,g1,g2,g3}, which makes the problem quite challenging.

you also can't simply divide the cardinalities of both sample spaces because the probability of selecting an element from one set of members of a certain color is different to doing the same with another.

The binomial coefficient C(n,m) = n!/[m!*(n-m)!] plays *two* roles: (1) it is the number of distinct subsets of size m contained in a set of size n; and (2) it is the number of different strings of type ABABB...A that are of length n and have m 'A's and (n-m) 'B's.

To see the latter, let F(n,m) be that number of strings. Clearly, we have F(n,0) = F(n,n) =1. We also have F(n,1) = F(n,n-1) = n, because if we have just one 'A' it can occupy any of the n places. Now suppose 1 < m < n-1. If the first letter is 'A' we have to put a string of m-1 'A's and (n-m) 'B's after it, and the number of such strings is F(n-1,m-1). If the first letter is 'B' we have F(n-1,m) strings remaining. Altogether, we get F(n,m) = F(n-1,m) + F(n-1,m-1), which is just Pascal's triangle. Together with the boundary conditions, we get (by induction) that F(n,m) = C(n,m).

RGV
 
Back
Top