I Probabilty of many world viewing.

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter EnglandSP
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    many world mwi
EnglandSP
Messages
2
Reaction score
5
I believe that anything is possible. If technology became so advanced, that it was suddenly possible to peer into any of the other worlds (in the infinite number of many worlds suggested by MWI) and see what was happening. What do you think we would see? What technology would be needed? What would be the pros and cons of doing this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
According to our current understanding, this is not possible. Speculating about this is not something that can be done at PhysicsForums.

Thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba

Thread 'Violation of Bell Inequality with unentangled photons'

I would like to know the validity of the following criticism of one of Zeilinger's latest papers https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.07756 "violation of bell inequality with unentangled photons" The review is by Francis Villatoro, in Spanish, https://francis.naukas.com/2025/07/26/sin-entrelazamiento-no-se-pueden-incumplir-las-desigualdades-de-bell/ I will translate and summarize the criticism as follows: -It is true that a Bell inequality is violated, but not a CHSH inequality. The...
View full post »

Thread 'Question about discussions around quantum interpretations'

I understand that the world of interpretations of quantum mechanics is very complex, as experimental data hasn't completely falsified the main deterministic interpretations (such as Everett), vs non-deterministc ones, however, I read in online sources that Objective Collapse theories are being increasingly challenged. Does this mean that deterministic interpretations are more likely to be true? I always understood that the "collapse" or "measurement problem" was how we phrased the fact that...
View full post »

Thread 'Modern View of Quantum Phenomena'

This is not, strictly speaking, a discussion of interpretations per se. We often see discussions based on QM as it was understood during the early days and the famous Einstein-Bohr debates. The problem with this is that things in QM have advanced tremendously since then, and the 'weirdness' that puzzles those attempting to understand QM has changed. I recently came across a synopsis of these advances, allowing those interested in interpretational issues to understand the modern view...
View full post »

Similar threads

I In the many worlds interpretation, how do the worlds join?
Replies
16
Views
1K
I The Horrifying Implications of the Many-Worlds Interpretation
Replies
2
Views
2K
I What is the true nature of worlds in the Many-Worlds Interpretation?
Replies
11
Views
3K
I Can Decoherence Explain the Many Worlds Interpretation?
Replies
18
Views
3K
Quantum mechanics, many worlds, and its implications -- I have questions
Replies
47
Views
3K
I How Does the Many-Worlds Interpretation Address Nonlocality?
Replies
10
Views
2K
I Why do we experience the Born Rule in Many Worlds?
Replies
34
Views
4K
I How many worlds is Many Worlds talking about?
Replies
16
Views
3K
I Many worlds and interference
Replies
4
Views
1K
I MWI and interpretation of measurements
Replies
15
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top