Probably quite simple but i'm stuck

  • Thread starter Thread starter .....
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stuck
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the minimum distance between the point (3,-2,4) and a given line defined by parametric equations. The initial approach involved calculating a point on the line and determining a vector to the given point, but confusion arose regarding the normal vector to the line. It was clarified that a single line in R^3 does not have a unique normal vector, as it lies in multiple planes. A more effective method suggested involves finding a point on the line where the normal from the given point intersects, leading to the use of calculus to minimize the distance function. The conversation concludes with a successful resolution to the problem, highlighting the importance of understanding geometric relationships in 3D space.
.....
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
I'm stuck on this question... if someone could give me a hand that'd be great..

What is the minimum distance between the point (3,-2,4) and the line defined by

x = 1 + t
y = 4 - 3t
z = -2 + 2t


My approach was to find a point on the line by letting t = 1

I got (2, 1, 0)

then I found a vector between this point and the one given:

v = i -3j + 4k

Here's a picture to clarify:

mathprob.bmp.jpg


Then the distance would be the scalar projection of this vector onto the normal vecor of the line

But I'm not sure how to find the normal to the line.

Could someone show me how?

And if there's a simpler approach could you show me that too?

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Geometrically,can u see what is the minimum distance...?Come on,it's something i learned when i was 12...

Daniel.
 
A single line in R^3 doesn't have a single normal vector, since it lies on an infinite number of planes.

The way I would try this to find two points in cartesian coordinates and find the line equation in those coordinates. Then using the distance formula and some max/min calculus, minimize the distance function.
 
here is what i would try

L = \sqrt{(x_0-x_1)^2 +(y_0-y_1)^2 (z_0-z_1)^2
L = \sqrt{(1+t-3)^2 +(4-3t+2)^2 (-2+2t-4)^2}
= \sqrt{(t-2)^2 +(-3t+6)^2 (2t-6)^2}
= |t-2|\sqrt{36t^2-216t+325}

Then take the derivative in respect to t. Find the critical points, and then pick the minimum one.
 
why not do something simpler? all you need to do is to find the point Q on the line where the normal vector passing through (3,-2,4) cuts it...that point looks like (1+t,4-3t,-2+2t) for some t. that is the t you need to find...and to do that use the fact that PQ is normal to the given line...
 
^^that works, i got it.

thanks a lot mansi.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top