Problem about uniformly continuous

  • Thread starter Thread starter herbyoung
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuous
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves showing that a uniformly continuous function defined on the interval [0, infinity) is bounded by a linear function of the form |f(x)| ≤ Ax + B for all x in that interval.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss a proof by contradiction approach, questioning the implications of uniform continuity on the behavior of the function f. There are inquiries about expressing the contradiction in terms of the definition of uniform continuity.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different angles and suggesting that the definition of uniform continuity and the reverse triangle inequality may be relevant to the proof. There is no explicit consensus on the next steps or a complete solution.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express a desire for complete answers, while others remind them of the forum's guidelines against providing full solutions. This indicates a focus on maintaining a learning-oriented environment.

herbyoung
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let I be the interval I=[0,infinity). Let f: I to R be uniformly continuous. Show there exist positive constants A and B such that |f(x)|<=Ax+B for all x that belongs to I.


2. The attempt at a solution
Proof by contradiction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Proof by contradiction:
Let I be the interval I = [0, infinity). Let f: I to R be uniformly continuous.

Suppose that for all positive A and B, there is an x = x(A, B) in I such that |f(x)| > Ax + B.

All you have to derive a contradiction with is the uniform continuity of f. Can you write this out in terms of f(x) (i.e. the definition)?
 
Can you complete the answer please ??
I am interesting to know how we can prove this .
 
I didn't solve it myself at the time, but some quick scribbles show that if you use the definition and the reverse triangle inequality it should work out.
How far did you get?
 
mariama1 said:
Can you complete the answer please ??

We don't provide complete answers here, only hints. If you're trying to do this problem yourself, please start a new thread instead of hijacking an old one.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K