Problem graphing Irradiance and distance experiment

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on graphing the relationship between irradiance and distance using a solar cell and a ray box. The user graphed their results but noted that the inverse square law graph did not produce a straight line, indicating potential issues with either the data collected or the graphing method. Key equations referenced include I1d12=I2d22 and I = k / d^2, which describe the expected relationship between intensity and distance. The user also highlighted challenges related to background light and the characteristics of the ray box used in the experiment.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the inverse square law in physics
  • Familiarity with graphing techniques and data visualization
  • Basic knowledge of solar cell operation and irradiance measurement
  • Experience with experimental controls in scientific experiments
NEXT STEPS
  • Investigate the effects of background light on solar cell readings
  • Learn about the characteristics of ideal point light sources versus ray boxes
  • Explore methods to minimize reflection and improve experimental accuracy
  • Study advanced graphing techniques for non-linear data sets
USEFUL FOR

Students conducting physics experiments, educators teaching about light and irradiance, and anyone interested in improving experimental design and data analysis in scientific research.

SuchBants
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Used a solar cell and a ray box, altering the distance from the solar cell to the light source in 10cm increments.
Did the usual high school experimental controls and repeats.
Assuming that the voltage is proportional to the irradiance, I am meant to graph the results.

Homework Equations


[/B]
I1d12=I2d22

I = k / d^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I graphed the results:
http://imgur.com/a/Pc70V[/B]

But as you can see, the inverse square graph isn't a straight line and I don't know why. Could it be my results or am I graphing it wrong?


 
Physics news on Phys.org
SuchBants said:

Homework Statement


Used a solar cell and a ray box, altering the distance from the solar cell to the light source in 10cm increments.
Did the usual high school experimental controls and repeats.
Assuming that the voltage is proportional to the irradiance, I am meant to graph the results.

Homework Equations


[/B]
I1d12=I2d22

I = k / d^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I graphed the results:
http://imgur.com/a/Pc70V[/B]

But as you can see, the inverse square graph isn't a straight line and I don't know why. Could it be my results or am I graphing it wrong?

What did you get when you turned the light source off?
 
berkeman said:
What did you get when you turned the light source off?

I removed as much background light as I could so the base reading was 0V, I checked that it returned to 0V between each distance when the light source was off
 
SuchBants said:
I removed as much background light as I could so the base reading was 0V, I checked that it returned to 0V between each distance when the light source was off
Can you say more about your "light box"? How well were reflections attenuated?
 
berkeman said:
Can you say more about your "light box"? How well were reflections attenuated?

I don't know, it's just an average high school ray box with no filter or slits attached. So it's not a point light source
 
SuchBants said:
I don't know, it's just an average high school ray box with no filter or slits attached. So it's not a point light source
Can you post a picture or a drawing? Can you see how there might be multiple paths that the source light can take to get to your detector (via reflections)? Would something like that lead to less than the ideal drop-off as you got farther away? If so, how?
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K