Problem involving circular movement and friction.

AI Thread Summary
Amtrak's Acela train uses a tilting mechanism to enhance passenger comfort while negotiating curves, reducing the friction force experienced against seats. When calculating the friction force needed for a passenger of mass 75 kg on a curve with a radius of 600 m at 160 km/h, the first part yields 247.31 N without needing the coefficient of friction. The second part, concerning the train's maximum tilt of 8°, requires understanding that both the normal force and friction contribute to the centripetal force. A free body diagram (FBD) can help clarify the forces at play, emphasizing the importance of both components in the calculation. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurately determining the friction force in tilted scenarios.
anightlikethis
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Amtrak's high speed train, the Acela, utilizes tilt of the cars when negotiating curves. The angle of tilt is adjusted so that the main force exerted on the passengers, to provide the centripetal acceleration, is the normal force. The passengers experience less friction force against the seat, thus feeling more comfortable. Consider an Acela train that rounds a curve with a radius of 600 m at a speed of 160 km/h (approximately 100 mi/h).
a)Calculate the friction force needed on a train passenger of mass 75 kg if the track is not banked and the train does not tilt.
b) Calculate the friction force on the passenger if the train tilts to its maximum tilt of 8° toward the center of the curve.

I figured out the answer to A which is 247.31 N, but I B is confusing me. I would think that in order to find the friction i would need the coefficient of friction. Do they want static or kinetic friction? The only equations I have related to friction are: Kinetic friction = uk*Fn and Maximum friction=us*Fn. However, I think that this equation has something to do with the equation for when no friction is required Fnsintheta=m(v^2/r)but I'm not sure how.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anightlikethis said:
Amtrak's high speed train, the Acela, utilizes tilt of the cars when negotiating curves. The angle of tilt is adjusted so that the main force exerted on the passengers, to provide the centripetal acceleration, is the normal force. The passengers experience less friction force against the seat, thus feeling more comfortable. Consider an Acela train that rounds a curve with a radius of 600 m at a speed of 160 km/h (approximately 100 mi/h).
a)Calculate the friction force needed on a train passenger of mass 75 kg if the track is not banked and the train does not tilt.
b) Calculate the friction force on the passenger if the train tilts to its maximum tilt of 8° toward the center of the curve.

I figured out the answer to A which is 247.31 N, but I B is confusing me. I would think that in order to find the friction i would need the coefficient of friction. Do they want static or kinetic friction? The only equations I have related to friction are: Kinetic friction = uk*Fn and Maximum friction=us*Fn. However, I think that this equation has something to do with the equation for when no friction is required Fnsintheta=m(v^2/r)but I'm not sure how.
But you nicely calculated the friction force necessary in part a without having to know us or uk, so why do you feel you need it in part B? You're on the right track with your equation, but the friction force also contributes to the centripetal force. Draw a good FBD and identify all forces and force components.
 
The centripetal force is provided by both normal force and friction. Thus, consider the horizontal component of both normal and friction force, which the total will be the centripetal force.
 
Thanks, that was very helpful
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top