Problem involving implicit differentiation over an ellipse

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves implicit differentiation related to an ellipse defined by the equation x^2 + 4y^2 = 5. A lamppost is positioned at x=3, casting a shadow that touches the ellipse and crosses the x-axis at (-5,0). The objective is to determine the height of the lamppost based on the geometry of the situation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore different methods to express the shadow line and its intersection with the ellipse. Some suggest using parametric equations for points on the ellipse, while others propose defining the shadow line in terms of the height of the lamp. There is discussion about the necessity of using derivatives versus algebraic methods to find the solution.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various approaches being considered. Some participants have provided alternative methods for finding the intersection points, while others express uncertainty about the best way to proceed. There is no explicit consensus on a single method yet, but several productive lines of reasoning have been introduced.

Contextual Notes

Participants note challenges in deriving explicit coordinates for the intersection points and the implications of the problem being taken from a section on implicit differentiation. There is also mention of LaTeX formatting issues affecting the clarity of mathematical expressions.

hexag1
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


So here's a question from my textbook 'Calculus: Concepts and Contexts' 2nd ed. by James Stewart. This is section 3.6 # 54

We have Cartesian coordinates set up with an ellipse at x^2 + 4y^2 = 5

To the right of the ellipse a lamppost (in 2D!) stands at x=3 with unknown height. The lamppost shines a light to the left over the ellipse. The ellipse then casts a shadow. The point at (-5,0) marks where the edge of the shadow crosses the x-axis. The shadow-line is a line tangential to the ellipse running from the lamplight to (-5,0). This is the only given value for the shadow-line. The shadow-line touches the ellipse on the top left quadrant.

The Question: how tall is the lamp?

Implicit differention with respect to x gives:

2x + 8y*y' = 0

solving for y' we have: y' = -x/4y

Homework Equations



ellipse : x^2 + 4y^2 = 5

derivative of ellipse : 2x + 8y*y' = 0

shadow-line intercept at (-5,0)

The Attempt at a Solution



I find it difficult to see how to proceed. I can find expressions for various elements of the problem, but they all seem to be written in terms of each other with no way to find a number for the height of the lamp.
If I call the point where the shadow line (which is tangential to the ellipse) intercepts the ellipse (j,k) then I find that the height of the lamp is -2j/k
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hihexag1! welcome to pf! :smile:

one way is to call a general point on the ellipse x = 5cosθ, y= 2.5 sinθ :wink:
 
My solution would be to define the shadow line by:
y=(x+5) h / 8
where h is the height of the lamp.

Intersect with the ellipse and find out for which h it will have only 1 solution for x.

Would this yield an acceptable solution or do you have to use derivatives?
 
I like Serena said:
My solution would be to define the shadow line by:
y=(x+5) h / 8
where h is the height of the lamp.

Intersect with the ellipse and find out for which h it will have only 1 solution for x.

Would this yield an acceptable solution or do you have to use derivatives?

I don't HAVE to do derivatives, but the problem is taken from the section on implicit differention, so I assumed that was the way to go about it.

I have tried intersecting the line and the ellipse, but I can only find equations for the line where the slip and 'b' (of y=mx+b format) are written in terms of the intersecting points, which I am trying to find in the first place! I find an equation for the line, but any and all substitutions that I make to and from the ellipse, I end up going in circles with no way to get a hold of the coordinates of the intersection.
I can make an estimate of the intersection point, of course - its y-value is a bit less than
(5/4)^(1/2) <--sorry I'm having LaTex problems in chrome.
 


tiny-tim said:
hihexag1! welcome to pf! :smile:

one way is to call a general point on the ellipse x = 5cosθ, y= 2.5 sinθ :wink:

Right - so I could write the ellipse as a squashed circle. But how do I find Θ ??
 
first find the slope of the tangent at a general point θ, and use that to find the equation of the tangent :smile:

(alternatively, as you say, it's a squashed circle :biggrin:

so unsquash it by changing the coordinates, and then use simple trig!)

of course, I like Serena's :smile: method is also very simple, involving no calculus, and nothing more tricky than complete the square :wink:
 
hexag1 said:
I don't HAVE to do derivatives, but the problem is taken from the section on implicit differention, so I assumed that was the way to go about it.

I have tried intersecting the line and the ellipse, but I can only find equations for the line where the slip and 'b' (of y=mx+b format) are written in terms of the intersecting points, which I am trying to find in the first place! I find an equation for the line, but any and all substitutions that I make to and from the ellipse, I end up going in circles with no way to get a hold of the coordinates of the intersection.
I can make an estimate of the intersection point, of course - its y-value is a bit less than
(5/4)^(1/2) <--sorry I'm having LaTex problems in chrome.

If you substitute
y=(x+5) h / 8
into
x²+4y²=5

you'll get a quadratic equation of the form
ax²+bx+c=0

It has 1 solution if the discriminant is zero:
D=b²-4ac=0

Solve h from this equation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K