Problem of solving the cubic function

  • Thread starter Thread starter Martin Zhao
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cubic Function
Martin Zhao
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Guys, I may need your help. There is a question saying that how to solve the cubic function in general form, which means that y=ax^3+bx^2+cx+d. How do you guys solve for x? To be honest, I have no idea of this question. Probably, it uses the same way as the quartic function. Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
There are numerous ways of solving cubic functions, but the most efficient way would be to plot it using some type of software--most easily maple, MATLAB, or Mathematica. Once you do that, locate one of the roots. Use the root as a factor, and divide the cubic by that factor to obtain a quadratic. Quadratics are easy to solve, thus you can easily find the remaining two roots.
 
AMenendez said:
There are numerous ways of solving cubic functions, but the most efficient way would be to plot it using some type of software--most easily maple, MATLAB, or Mathematica. Once you do that, locate one of the roots. Use the root as a factor, and divide the cubic by that factor to obtain a quadratic. Quadratics are easy to solve, thus you can easily find the remaining two roots.

Well, if you're going to be content with numerical answers, then there are many good techniques to approximate the roots to a very high degree: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton's_method
 
For the cubic equation ax^3+bx^2+cx+d=0 (in your case the constant term is d-y, not d), try substituting x = z +\frac{\gamma}{z}, and solve for z by choosing the constant \gamma correctly. If fairly certain that for a good choice of \gamma (it will become apparent what \gamma must be) you will end up with a quadratic function in z^2.

This way you may arrive at the formula yourself, it's a neat exercise. You probably need to be careful verifying your solution afterwards, as z +\frac{\gamma}{z} is not defined everywhere, and does not attain all values. To make calculations easier, you can assume a = 1 first, and make the necessary modification afterwards.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top