Problem related to the compound Poisson process (?)

gabe_rosser
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

I wonder if anyone has come across this problem before and could point me to a relevant ref or tell me what terms I might search for:

I am interested in a continuous time process in which two alternating events (call them A and B) occur. Each event has an exponentially distributed duration, with different rate constants. They occur consecutively and exclusively: A immediately follows B and vice-versa, with no overlapping or gaps.

Our experiment always starts with A. After an exponentially distributed waiting time, B occurs. After a second time wait, exponentially distributed but with different rate constant, A occurs again, etc.

I am seeking the expected number of events (or pairs of events) that occur in a given time interval.

I have attempted this myself, but my approach became complicated quite rapidly so I thought I would check here first to see if anyone had come across this before.

Thanks, and apologies for the lengthy description.

Gabriel
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the proper terminology for your model is a "continuous time Markov process". Look it up and see if that fits. If not, let us know.
 
Thanks for the suggestion. I should have thought to think of it as a Markov process.

I'm still not sure how to use this description to get at my desired result, however. Does anyone know of any results relating to the expected number of transition events for a given Markov chain? I'll look into this as well and post if I find anything useful.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top