Problem Solving and Professional Mathematics

philosophking
Messages
175
Reaction score
0
Hi, I was wondering what the "big" math people here think about a correllation between recreational problems and performance in professional math fields. I hope this isn't too much of a stupid question. But this is what I was thinking.

I was wondering if people who do well on the AIME, USAMO, IMO, Putnam are the only people who can *really* succeed in the professional math world? Or can there be mathematicians who may not be so good at these problem solving competitions but still do very well in their respective field?

I've been fighting with this problem quite a bit, because I'm a little scared of how I stack up with other math majors out there. Will it end up hurting me in the end if I don't do well on the Putnam? Are there other ways to display my mathematical abilities, aside from classes?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
My impression is that people who do well in mathematics are also people who like to solve puzzles. Of course, it doesn't follow that the converse is true!
 
Almost all of the good mathematicians I know who were brought up in the UK do cryptic crossword puzzles (some even set them). Doing cryptic crosswords doesn't mean you can do maths.
 
philosophking said:
Hi, I was wondering what the "big" math people here think about a correllation between recreational problems and performance in professional math fields. I hope this isn't too much of a stupid question. But this is what I was thinking.

I was wondering if people who do well on the AIME, USAMO, IMO, Putnam are the only people who can *really* succeed in the professional math world? Or can there be mathematicians who may not be so good at these problem solving competitions but still do very well in their respective field?

i don't think there's much connection between the two. like any other area of math, there are many textbooks full of techniques/tricks that can be learned. in a calculus text you'd learn different ways to differentiate/integrate stuff; in those problem books you learn about working backwards & other things, etc. maybe there's a bit of a connection in that the people who are interested in the putnam, etc are the ones who like math enough to do extra stuff like contests. (ie the people who do the contests is a subset of the people who really like doing math)
 
Yeah, I wonder that too. I also wonder whether or not there is a lack of creativity that is outside of that subset but still in the main set (to go along with your illustration) that can have significant contributions to mathematics.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top