Problem solving for time when average power and total energy is given

AI Thread Summary
The problem involves calculating the time a student spends walking given her average power expenditure rates of 280 W while walking and 120 W while resting, with a total energy expenditure of 1.3×10^7 J over 24 hours. The average power for the day is calculated to be approximately 150.5 W, which raises questions about the feasibility of spending 280 W during walking. The equation P1.t + P2.(24-t) = W is set up to solve for the walking time, but when numbers are plugged in, the resulting time appears excessively large. The discussion highlights the need to ensure proper unit conversion and careful application of the equations to arrive at a reasonable solution. Accurate calculations are essential for determining the correct time spent walking.
Zunden
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A student spends part of her day walking between classes or for recreation, during which time she expends energy at an average rate of 280 W. The remainder of the day she is sitting in class, studying, or resting; during these activities, she expends energy at an average rate of 120 W.

If she expends a total of 1.3×10^7 J of energy in a 24-hour day, how much of the day did she spend walking?

Knowns:

P1avg=280W
P2avg=120W
E=1.3*10^7J in one day.

Unknowns:

time spent walking.

Homework Equations



P=W/t
Pavg=W2-W1/t2-t1
Pint=dW/dt
1W=1J/s
??

The Attempt at a Solution


If total energy is 1.3*10^7J for the day, then that would mean Ptotal=1.3*10^7/86400s = 150.5W.
If this is the total power for the day how can she spend 280W walking in part of the day?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Total work done = total energy spent = W (let)

let she spends 't' hours time walking, so rest time in class is '24-t' hours.

so, P1.t + P2.(24-t) = W.

solve and get answer.
 
Thanks for the response. But when i plug numbers into that formula it gives me a time that is way too big to be right.
 
covert the time in seconds.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top