Solve SAT Physics Test: Problem-Solving Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter tmntbunny
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Problem-solving
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on preparing for the SAT Physics Test, highlighting the individual's struggle with panic during problem-solving despite having taken physics courses. Key advice includes focusing on fundamental concepts like free body diagrams and the net force equation, as well as mastering kinematics and circular motion equations. Participants emphasize the importance of a calm mindset, suggesting techniques to manage anxiety and improve recall of formulas. They recommend a step-by-step approach to problem-solving, including defining variables and checking units. Overall, the conversation underscores the need for preparation and mental strategies to boost confidence and performance in physics.
tmntbunny
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Ok so I'm taking the SAT physics Test soon and I'm woefully unprepared!
I've taken physics 2 times already, honors and AP, as well as reteaching it to myself, but i just don't get it. I think my problem is,whenever i see a problem, I panic. I'm ok when learning the material, if i get a few problems wrong i just move on but when i can't look at the formulas or the concepts for reference, i usually just guess. And when i finish studying the whole course I can NEVER remember any formulas of concepts i once had down pat.
It's so weird I've always gotten math, but never physics and I want to major in it in college. Can anyone help??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tmntbunny said:
Ok so I'm taking the SAT physics Test soon and I'm woefully unprepared!
I've taken physics 2 times already, honors and AP, as well as reteaching it to myself, but i just don't get it. I think my problem is,whenever i see a problem, I panic. I'm ok when learning the material, if i get a few problems wrong i just move on but when i can't look at the formulas or the concepts for reference, i usually just guess. And when i finish studying the whole course I can NEVER remember any formulas of concepts i once had down pat.
It's so weird I've always gotten math, but never physics and I want to major in it in college. Can anyone help??

Stick to fundamentals. Make sure you always use free body diagrams, and make sure that you remember that the net force on a body is equal to its mass times its acceleration. That alone will probably cover a large fraction of the problems you encounter.

I'm sure you're pretty OK on kinematics, but you need to remember the equation for the radial acceleration of a body in circular motion: V2/R = ω2R.
 
First, do not panic. You need to get a good night's sleep and have a proper breakfast.

Remember, it takes time to think. Look at the material, then look away and say to yourself, "Think of nothing". Then look back at the work.

Do one step at a time. First, find what is the problem. Then read given statement, and define variables. Recall what theory is needed. This theory will give you equation(s) for the variables. Write the equations, check units (meters, sec, etc.), simplify, and solve.

Your job is to get started. Your panic is because you want to see the end, which you cannot. You only know how to get started. See Teaching and Helping Students Think and Do Better as an example of books you can read to help you.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top