Problem with a proof in probability

  • Thread starter Thread starter DJ_JK
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that P(A and B|A) is greater than or equal to P(A and B|A or B) for any two events A and B. The user attempts to simplify the left side by reasoning that since A is already fulfilled, it can be treated as a constant in the probability calculation. However, confusion arises regarding the simplification of the right side and the potential priority of conditions in probability. A suggestion is made to explicitly write out both probabilities to compare their numerators and denominators, which may clarify the relationship between the two expressions. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding conditional probability to resolve the proof.
DJ_JK

Homework Statement


I have to prove that for any two events A and B
P(A and B|A) \geq P(A and B| A or B)

Homework Equations


P(A and B) = P(A) . P(B|A)
P(A|B) = (P(A) . P(B|A))/P(B)


The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to simplify the left side with this reasoning
P(A and B|A) = P(A) . P((B|A)|A)
= P(A) . P(B|A)
= P(A and B)

My reasoning for going from step 1 to two is that condition A is already fulfilled, and asking for it a second time is needless. My friend however, disagrees with this.
I am having problems with simplifying the right side because I don't know if there is a system of priorities in probability mathematics (e.g. "condition" has a priority over "and", "or" over "condition", ...
Any help in the right direction would be greatly welcomed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember that for any two events \mathcal{C}, \mathcal{D} you have

<br /> \Pr(\mathcal{C} | \mathcal{D}) = \frac{\Pr(\mathcal{C} \cap \mathcal{D})}{\Pr{\mathcal{D}}}<br />

Use this idea to write out both of the probabilities you need to compare. If you do it correctly you should notice something about the numerators and the denominators, and those items will allow you to argue for the conclusion you need.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...
Back
Top