MHB Problem with cross multiplication

Trinley
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello, I have been poring over this problem for days, and I would really appreciate some help. I'm not sure if it's an algebra problem exactly. It's from my physiology class. The professor said it's simple cross multiplication, and I asked him to explain it again, but I didn't understand his explanation. Here's the problem:

The oxygen carrying capacity of hemoglobin is about 1.34 mL of O2 per gram of hemoglobin (Hb).
Imagine a person with 30 mL O2 per 100 mL of blood.
What would his Hb concentration be?


So I have these two figures:

1.34 mL O2 / 1 g Hb
and
30 mL O2/100 mL blood.

I know the answer is about 22.4 g Hb / 100 mL blood. I know 30/1.34 = 22.4, but I would like to really understand how the problem is set up so that it makes sense to me.

Can anyone help? Thank you.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Trinley said:
Hello, I have been poring over this problem for days, and I would really appreciate some help. I'm not sure if it's an algebra problem exactly. It's from my physiology class. The professor said it's simple cross multiplication, and I asked him to explain it again, but I didn't understand his explanation. Here's the problem:

The oxygen carrying capacity of hemoglobin is about 1.34 mL of O2 per gram of hemoglobin (Hb).
Imagine a person with 30 mL O2 per 100 mL of blood.
What would his Hb concentration be?


So I have these two figures:

1.34 mL O2 / 1 g Hb
and
30 mL O2/100 mL blood.

I know the answer is about 22.4 g Hb / 100 mL blood. I know 30/1.34 = 22.4, but I would like to really understand how the problem is set up so that it makes sense to me.

Can anyone help? Thank you.

Set up ratios..

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} O_2 &: \textrm{ Hb } \\ 1.34 &: 1 \\ 1 &: \frac{1}{1.34} \\ 1 &: \frac{100}{134} \\ 1 &: \frac{50}{67} \\ \\ O_2 &: \textrm{ Blood } \\ 30 &: 100 \\ 1 &: \frac{100}{30} \\ 1 &: \frac{10}{3} \\ \\ \textrm{Hb } &: \textrm{ Blood } \\ \frac{50}{67} &: \frac{10}{3} \\ \frac{3}{10} \cdot \frac{50}{67} &: 1 \\ \frac{15}{67} &: 1 \end{align*}$

So the concentration is $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \frac{15}{67} \end{align*}$ mL of Hb to every mL of blood.
 
That does give the right answer. The professor showed this question in class and asked us calculate it without explaining how. Some people pulled out their phones and gave the answer about 20 seconds. I don't see how they were able to do that. It seems like this way of setting up ratios would take longer and would not be something you can plug into the calculator for a quick answer. Clearly they knew to divide 30 by 1.34, but I don't know how.

The professor showed me that I would just have to set up a simple cross multiplication, but he spoke very quickly and I couldn't follow. Is there a way to set this up as cross multiplication with a minimum of steps?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top