Problem with power and potential energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the potential energy of a particle influenced by varying forces based on its position along the x-axis. The forces are defined as attractive when x > a and repulsive when 0 < x < a, leading to attempts to integrate the power functions to find potential energy. The initial integration approach resulted in an infinite constant when assuming U(0) = 0, prompting suggestions to instead set U(a) = 0 or U(∞) = 0 for a more manageable solution. Additionally, the movement of the particle, released from rest at 2a, is analyzed to show that it briefly stands still at x = a/sqrt(2). The conversation highlights the challenges in defining potential energy under these conditions and explores alternative assumptions for integration.
costas
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Particle mass m is moving along the x-axis.
The particle is attracted to the principle axis O to measure power mk/x^2 when x>a
and repels the O with measure power mka/x^3 when 0<x<a, where a,k>0

i) Find the potential energy of the particle
ii)The particle is released from rest at 2a from O. Describe the movement to perform the particle and show that the particle will stand briefly when x=a/sqrt2

The Attempt at a Solution


i) I tried to find the potential energy by integrating the function of power:

....mk / x ^ 2 , x> a
F (x) =
....mka / x ^ 3 , 0 <x <a

using the relation F (x) = - dU / dx, but the integral constant C if assume that U (O) = 0, goes infinity (oo).

I still can not design the function of potential energy which found that likely have the form:

.....-mk / x , x> a
U (x) =
...mka / x ^ 2 , 0 <x <a

ii) For the second question I can not think of anything.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi costas! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
costas said:
using the relation F (x) = - dU / dx, but the integral constant C if assume that U (O) = 0, goes infinity (oo).

Then don't assume U(0) = 0 :wink:

assume U(a) = 0, or U(∞) = 0. :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top