Problem with Understanding Ampere's Law

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr-R
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ampere's law Law
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of Ampere's Law, specifically the equation \(\oint B \cdot dl = \mu I\). The user initially misunderstands the integration process for a circular loop, mistakenly applying the formula \(B = \frac{\mu I}{2\pi r}\) instead of the correct \(B = \frac{\mu I}{4\pi r^{2}}\). This leads to confusion regarding the results of the integration. Ultimately, the user acknowledges their misunderstanding and indicates that they have resolved their issue.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Ampere's Law and its mathematical formulation.
  • Familiarity with magnetic field concepts and their calculations.
  • Knowledge of integration techniques in calculus.
  • Basic understanding of circular symmetry in physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Ampere's Law in different geometries, focusing on circular loops.
  • Learn about the Biot-Savart Law and its relationship to Ampere's Law.
  • Explore the implications of magnetic field strength variations with distance in different configurations.
  • Practice solving problems involving magnetic fields generated by current-carrying conductors.
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of electromagnetism and the application of Ampere's Law in various contexts.

Mr-R
Messages
123
Reaction score
23
Dear all,

I am trying use Ampere's law and came across a problem which is a result of my lack of understanding.

[itex]\oint[/itex] B.dl=uI
My lecturer derived the above equation by defining a point in the middle of a potato shaped loop. Where he stated that dl in this case is just rdθ. (r is the line joining dl to the point defined in the middle). And using B=[itex]\frac{uI}{2πr}[/itex] he integrated it with respect to rdθ from θ=0 to 2π to get [itex]\oint[/itex] B.dl=uI.

Now, I am trying to do the same for a circular loop. Obviously I got the same answer uI. But its wrong as it should be [itex]\frac{uI}{2r}[/itex]. The problem is that I am using the same approch he used for the general shape but not getting the same answer. I am using B=[itex]\frac{uI}{2πr}[/itex] where I should actually use B=[itex]\frac{uI}{4πr^{2}}[/itex]

Could someone explain why can't I do that?

P.s sorry if this is messy. It is my first time.
Rashid
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I got it guys. Mods can close this.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
13K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K