Problems calculating the New Moment of Inertia

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the new moment of inertia (MoI) after adding a mass to a rotating disc. Two main approaches are suggested: finding the center of mass (C.O.M) of the system or applying conservation of angular momentum about a fixed point. It is emphasized that the new C.O.M changes with the added mass, affecting the MoI calculation. The importance of considering the mass of the attached object in relation to the disc's mass is highlighted, as it influences the new center of rotation. The correct method involves calculating the new C.O.M and then applying conservation of angular momentum to find the updated MoI.
KMconcordia
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Member advised to post their problem/question in the required format.

Homework Statement


Posted Photo with Work done so far, but my MOI is off

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • IMG_8618.JPG
    IMG_8618.JPG
    21.7 KB · Views: 341
Physics news on Phys.org
There are a couple of ways to approach this problem.
You can find the mass centre of the system then use that angular momentum will be conserved about that point. I tend to avoid finding mass centres of systems because there is usually an easier way, but in this case it might be simplest.
Alternatively, you can take conservation of angular momentum about any fixed point - the initial position of either the centre of the disc or the point where the mass is attached, say. This way, you can just treat each body as contributing to angular momentum, but you will also need to use conservation of linear momentum. E.g. if you take the initial position of the disc's centre as axis then the subsequent linear motion of the attached particle needs to be related to the new angular rotation rate.

Your calculation of the new MoI is in respect of an axis at the perimeter of the disc. That would be fine if that point were the new centre of rotation, but it will not be. The mass of the attached object must feature in the answer. E.g. if the attached mass is very small there will be little change to the rotation of the disk.
 
So which formula would be the correct way to approach part B?
 
KMconcordia said:
So which formula would be the correct way to approach part B?
It's not a matter of some handy formula readily applied. You must first decide your approach. I described two options.
 
@haruspex you say something about using conservation of linear momentum... I tried to read the problem as carefully as I could but I couldn't find any data regarding the linear momentum of any of the bodies, isn't the linear momentum 0 for all bodies of the system (before and after the "collision")?
 
Last edited:
Delta2 said:
@haruspex you say something about using conservation of linear momentum... I tried to read the problem as carefully as I could but I couldn't find any data regarding the linear momentum of any of the bodies, isn't the linear momentum 0 for all bodies of the system (before and after the "collision")?
The system has zero linear momentum throughout, but after the collision they will each have linear momentum.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Delta2 said:
@haruspex you say something about using conservation of linear momentum... I tried to read the problem as carefully as I could but I couldn't find any data regarding the linear momentum of any of the bodies, isn't the linear momentum 0 for all bodies of the system (before and after the "collision")?
Do you have any other way in mind about approaching this problem? My final exams tomorrow and I am very lost..
 
Calculate the C.O.M of the disk+particle, then find the moment of inertia ##I'## of disk+particle around the C.O.M, then apply conservation of angular momentum ##I'\omega'=I\omega##
 
media%2Fb3c%2Fb3cf3061-93d5-4192-a1df-8dbf6159fc58%2FphpAB63zn.png
would this make sense
 

Attachments

  • media%2Fb3c%2Fb3cf3061-93d5-4192-a1df-8dbf6159fc58%2FphpAB63zn.png
    media%2Fb3c%2Fb3cf3061-93d5-4192-a1df-8dbf6159fc58%2FphpAB63zn.png
    44 KB · Views: 281
  • #10
b) would be approximately correct if the mass of 10kg was small compared to the mass of the disc so that the new center of rotation was about the same as the old center of rotation and the same as the center of the disc. But 10kg is a lot compared to the 0.5kg of the mass of the disc so this method isn't correct all.

As i said before you have to find the new c.o.m of the system which will be the new center of rotation. That's the tricky part of this exercise, that the center of rotation changes (and the center of mass as well) when the mass of 10kg is added to the disc.

To find the new c.o.m of the system: Imagine that you have a mass of 0.5kg as a point particle at the center, and the mass of 10kg at distance R=0.25m, then the c.o.m is at distance x from the center such that ##0.5x-10(R-x)=0##. Then calculate the total moment of inertia around the new c.o.m and then use conservation of angular momentum.

EDIT: I had a small mistake in the equation regarding the new c.o.m of the system which i corrected.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top