Problems with Blum's Karate Article

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter makamo66
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion critiques Haywood Blum's article "Physics and the art of kicking and punching," highlighting significant flaws in his analysis. The primary concerns include Blum's use of a beam with a couple applied at the ends instead of a mass impacting the center, and his failure to consider the orthotropic nature of wood while applying isotropic material formulas. Additionally, the lack of accessible online resources for Blum's article complicates further commentary and analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of beam mechanics and structural analysis
  • Knowledge of material properties, specifically orthotropic versus isotropic materials
  • Familiarity with biomechanics related to striking techniques
  • Basic skills in accessing and evaluating academic articles
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences between orthotropic and isotropic materials in engineering
  • Explore beam theory and its applications in structural mechanics
  • Study the biomechanics of striking, focusing on impact dynamics
  • Look for alternative resources on the physics of martial arts techniques
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for engineers, martial artists, sports scientists, and anyone interested in the physics of striking and material properties in relation to performance analysis.

makamo66
Messages
41
Reaction score
10
I have a couple of concerns with Haywood Blum's article "Physics and the art of kicking and punching." First of all, Blum considers a beam with a couple applied to the ends of the bar when he should be considering some kind of mass impacting the bar in the center and second of all, why does he use a beam and not a flat plate? Also, he doesn't take into consideration that wood is orthotropic and simply uses the formulas for an isotropic material. Unfortunately I couldn't find a free PDF of this article online any more but I was able to download the PDF at some time before.
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K