Problems with Critical Damping and Underdamping

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding critical and underdamping in harmonic oscillators. The user is confused about the equations needed to solve two specific problems related to critically damped and underdamped systems. For the critically damped system, they are attempting to find the displacement after 1 second but struggle with the constants in the equation. In the case of the underdamped oscillator, they are unsure how to establish a ratio of successive maxima. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity on the correct equations and methods to approach these damping problems.
NewtonsHead
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The concept of damping is new to me and the problems I have seen have had different known values than I see in the equations I have. Here's two I am working on.

1) An automobile suspension is critically damped, and its period of free oscillation with no
damping is 1s. If the system is initially displaced to a distance x0 and released from rest, find the displacement at t = 1 s.

2) Show that the ratio of two successive maxima in the displacement of an underdamped
harmonic oscillator is constant.


Homework Equations



Critical: x(t) = A e^ (-γ t ) + B e^ (-γ t) where A and B are constants and γ= (2c)/m

Underdamping: x(t) = A0 e ^ (-γt) cos (ω't + θ0)

I honestly don't know if these are the equations I need to find the answers.


The Attempt at a Solution



1. γ=ω0
= ω0 = √k/m
I found this Using the equation for the frequency of a spring (without damping)
∴ γ = 2π
If I plug this into the equation I have, I am still left with those constants... so I must have the wrong approach.

2. I can't think of where to begin on this one... it seems like the variables wouldn't be constant if I set up a ratio like x2/x1
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. The equation you have for the solution of a critically damped system in incorrect. What is the correct equation?

2. Just do it: set up the ratio for two successive maxima and see where that gets you.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top