Problems with identity in complex calc

  • Thread starter Thread starter betel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Identity
betel
Messages
318
Reaction score
0
Hello,

in a paper I have the identity

\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} d x \sqrt{(x-i\epsilon)^2-1}= I_+ - I_- + i \int_{-1}^{1}(\ldots)


where I_+ = \int_1^{\infty}(\ldots), I_=\int_{-\infty}^{-1}(\ldots) and \epsilon is a small positive number that will be taken to zero at the end.

My Problem is to get the minus sign between I_+ and I_-. In all my calculations I get +. The integrand for both should be \sqrt{x^2-1}.

Can anybody tell me what I am missing here to get the correct sign.
Thanks in advance.
betel
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think it's essential what you (or the author) means by "(...)" for the integrand.
 
In further calculations the author uses \sqrt{x^2-1}. The integrand is definitely real.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top