Product of reflection matrices without eigenvalue 1

zpconn
Messages
241
Reaction score
2
I'm wondering if anybody could suggest some techniques that might be brought to bear on the following problem:

Suppose a finite sequence M_1,M_2,\dots,M_k of 4\times 4 orthogonal reflection matrices is given. I'm interested in determining conditions on these matrices that will guarantee that the product of any ordered sub-collection having an even and nonzero number of elements does not have eigenvalue 1.

This is really the same as asking whether the result will be a simple or "double" rotation. If it's a simple rotation, the product will have an axis-plane that is fixed point-by-point and so will have eigenvalue 1. If it's a "double" rotation (two independent rotations in orthogonal 2-planes), then it will not have eigenvalue 1.

Or better yet: does anybody have any ideas for generating a list of matrices satisfying the specified property (besides just randomly generating matrices and testing all generated collections)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, I now don't think any such lists of 4x4 matrices exist.

Claim: Given at least three reflections of R^4 in distinct hyperplanes through the origin, the composition of some two of them is a simple rotation fixing a two-dimensional plane through the origin(its axis).

Proof(?): Maybe there's a proof using matrices directly, but my method uses the following connection with quaternions: the reflection of R^4 in the homogenous hyperplane orthogonal to the unit quaternion u is the map q \mapsto -qvq where v is the conjugate of u. (I can't get the \overline command in LaTeX to work here for some reason, so I will write the conjugate of u_i as v_i from here on out.) Another nontrivial observation, which follows from the previous one, is that the orthogonal rotations of R^4 are precisely the quaternion maps q \mapsto aqb for unit quaternions a,b.

Suppose three unit quaternions u_1,u_2,u_3 are given. The previous two observations imply [snip] that u_1 = u_2 = (v_1)^{-1}, and that's the end of the proof.

Now, my vague understanding is that in higher dimensions the quaternions are replaced by the so-called Clifford algebras. Most sources I've looked at for Clifford algebras are a little too advanced for me. Does anybody know of a good, easy introduction to Clifford algebras?
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top