Product of Two Terms: Determinant Evaluation and Vanishing Values in Terms of p

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nylex
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Determinants
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on evaluating a determinant and finding the values of x for which it vanishes, expressed in terms of p. The initial calculations lead to the equation x(x - p)² = 0, indicating that the solutions are x = 0 and x = p. Participants confirm the correctness of this result, with one expressing relief at realizing the mistake in their earlier approach. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying determinant properties to solve the problem. Ultimately, the correct values of x are established as 0 and p.
Nylex
Messages
552
Reaction score
2
Hi, I' not sure if I've done this question correctly so I just want someone to tell me where I've gone wrong (if I have).

Evaluate the following determinant as a product of two terms. Hence find, in terms of p the values of x for which it vanishes.

Grr, I can't seem to use LaTeX properly so I'll just "draw" the determinant:

x x 0
0 x p
-2x -p x

= x \left\vert \begin{array}{cc} x & p\\-p & x \end{array}\right\vert - x \left\vert \begin{array}{cc} 0 & p\\-2x & x \end{array}\right\vert

= x(x^2 + p^2) - x(2xp)
=x^3 + p^2.x - 2x^2.p
- x(x^2 - 2px + p^2) = 0

x = {-(-2p) +- [(-2p)^2 - 4.1.p^2]^1/2}/2

x = [2p +- (4p^2 - 4p^2)^1/2]/2

x = p

It doesn't look right to me :/.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Nylex said:
Hi, I' not sure if I've done this question correctly so I just want someone to tell me where I've gone wrong (if I have).

Evaluate the following determinant as a product of two terms. Hence find, in terms of p the values of x for which it vanishes.

Grr, I can't seem to use LaTeX properly so I'll just "draw" the determinant:

x x 0
0 x p
-2x -p x

= x \left\vert \begin{array}{cc} x & p\\-p & x \end{array}\right\vert - x \left\vert \begin{array}{cc} 0 & p\\-2x & x \end{array}\right\vert

= x(x^2 + p^2) - x(2xp)
=x^3 + p^2.x - 2x^2.p
- x(x^2 - 2px + p^2) = 0

x = {-(-2p) +- [(-2p)^2 - 4.1.p^2]^1/2}/2

x = [2p +- (4p^2 - 4p^2)^1/2]/2

x = p

It doesn't look right to me :/.
This is correct x(x-p)^2=0
==>x=0 or x=p
 
poolwin2001 said:
This is correct x(x-p)^2=0
==>x=0 or x=p

LOL, can't believe I didn't see that :redface:. Thanks a lot :smile:.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top