B Why Is Projected Area More Relevant Than Surface Area in Physics?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Rahul Manavalan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Theorem
AI Thread Summary
Projected area is often more relevant than surface area in physics due to its direct impact on force interactions, particularly in fluid dynamics and mechanics. In scenarios like surface tension in a water jet, the circular cross-section leads to a focus on projected area rather than the total curved surface area. This is because the forces acting on curved surfaces tend to sum in one direction and cancel in another, making projected area a more practical consideration. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurate calculations in various applications, such as bearing area assessments. The distinction between projected and surface area is essential for effective analysis in complex geometries.
Rahul Manavalan
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I wonder why projected area has been of much interest among physics communities, while the surface area could well be the solution unless any complex geometries are involved.
The question popped up in my head when the surface tension in a water jet was derived. Clearly the jet has a circular cross section.
Why not the curved surface area 4*(pi*r^2).
Other instance was when dealing with a bearing area calculation.
This puzzles me a great deal.
Hope someone could show me a way.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In practical applications it usually comes down to components of forces acting on curved surfaces summing in one direction and cancelling in another direction .
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top