Projectile, Laser, Plasma: Weapons of the Future?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores predictions for the most utilized weapon types in the next 50 to 100 years, focusing on projectiles, lasers, and plasma. Participants suggest that energy beams may dominate future warfare, while others advocate for the continued relevance of projectiles, especially advanced smart projectiles that can track targets. References to articles and technologies, such as MEMS and smart guns, highlight the potential for innovation in projectile weaponry. The conversation also touches on the uncertainty of humanity's future, questioning whether such advancements will even be necessary. Overall, the debate emphasizes a blend of traditional and futuristic weapon technologies.
KonradKorzenowski
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
In yuor opinion what is most likely to be the most used type of weapons in 50 to 100 years. Projectile, laser, plasma, etc.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Some form of energy beam, perhaps? The cynical of us might ask whether we're going to be around in 100 years time!

If you've not seen it, you might want to look at http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn1470.
 
Yes i have heard of that, but I see a future in projectiles as well. Perhaps you could put together lumps of MEMS made to "track" a target at the high speeds of a standard bullet.
http://www.metalstorm.com/04_what_is_a_smart_gun.html I found this a few months ago its interesting
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top