Projectile motion ball question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a projectile motion problem involving two balls rolling off shelves of different heights and the distances they travel horizontally before hitting the ground. The participants are exploring the relationship between the heights of the shelves and the distances traveled by the balls.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the constant horizontal motion of the balls and how it relates to the time of flight. They explore the relationship between the heights of the shelves and the time taken for the balls to fall, questioning how to formulate the ratio of the distances based on these factors.

Discussion Status

Some participants have made progress in understanding the relationship between time and distance, suggesting that the ratio of distances is related to the ratio of times. There is ongoing exploration of how to connect the time of flight to the heights from which the balls are dropped.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework problem, which may limit the information they can use or the methods they can apply. The discussion reflects uncertainty about the correct formulation of the equations involved.

Kristin_Z
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
A ball moving with speed v rolls off a shelf of height h and strikes the floor below a distance x1 from the edge. A second ball moving with the same speed rolls of a self of height 2h and strikes the floor a distance x2 away from the edge. Determine the ratio of distances x1/x2.
[tex]\Delta[/tex]x=Vxt
[tex]\Delta[/tex]y=vt +1/2st2
The horizontal motion of the ball is constant and, therefore, not affected by the height from which it rolls. But I cannot figure out how to formulate the ratio of the distances. I know that time relates the two equations of motion and that because the ball is rolling it has no initial vertical velocity and that since it is free fall the acceleration would be the same for the two equations. I just can't seem to get the equation to make sense when I write it out. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kristin_Z said:
A ball moving with speed v rolls off a shelf of height h and strikes the floor below a distance x1 from the edge. A second ball moving with the same speed rolls of a self of height 2h and strikes the floor a distance x2 away from the edge. Determine the ratio of distances x1/x2. The horizontal motion of the ball is constant and, therefore, not affected by the height from which it rolls. But I cannot figure out how to formulate the ratio of the distances. I know that time relates the two equations of motion and that because the ball is rolling it has no initial vertical velocity and that since it is free fall the acceleration would be the same for the two equations. I just can't seem to get the equation to make sense when I write it out. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

Well I can see you are almost grasping it.

The horizontal motion is constant, that's true, but what affects the distance at which it lands?

d1 = V*t1
d2 = V*t2

So ... the ratio of the distances then will be in the same ratio as the ratio of the times won't it?

And now is there some way to relate the ratio of the times using the heights?
 
I think I have it now.

2y = 1/2 at12 divided by y = 1/2 at22

gives me 2= t12t22

so t1t2 =square root of 1/2.

Thanks for your help, still not entirely sure I understand what I did. I guess that's what practice is for.
 
Kristin_Z said:
I think I have it now.

so t1t2 =square root of 1/2.
.

Check this step.
 
Kristin_Z said:
I think I have it now.

2y = 1/2 at12 divided by y = 1/2 at22

gives me 2= t12t22

so t1t2 =square root of 1/2.

Thanks for your help, still not entirely sure I understand what I did. I guess that's what practice is for.

I think you really meant
2= t12/t22

Which yields the ratio

t1/t2 = √2

But I would note the original statement has y2 being 2*y1, so I think you have your subscripts reversed.

The higher ball would fall farther from the base by a factor of √2 is the sense of you should be grasping.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K