How Does Air Resistance Affect Projectile Motion and Free Fall?

AI Thread Summary
Air resistance, or drag, significantly impacts projectile motion and free fall by opposing the force of gravity. The general differential equation for motion with air drag is m(dv/dt) = F - γv², where F represents typical forces like gravity, and γ is a drag coefficient influenced by the object's shape, cross-sectional area, and fluid density. The drag coefficient is calculated using the formula γ = (ρ_fl * A * C_d) / 2. As time progresses, the velocity approaches a constant known as terminal velocity, indicating that the object will eventually stop accelerating. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurately predicting the behavior of objects in motion through a fluid medium.
MIKART2
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi, i want to know what are the real effects of air (drag) in the projectile movement and free fall, i mean how drag or air resistance is calculated in both movements, with equations.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The general differential equation for motion with airdrag is (assuming "high" velocity and fluid at rest):

<br /> m\frac{d \vec v}{d t}=\vec F-\gamma v^2<br />

Where F is your "usual" forces, gravity etc and \gamma is a factor that depends on the geometry of your body (shape an cross-sectional area) and the density of the fluid:

<br /> \gamma=\frac{\rho_{fl}A C_d}{2}<br />

You can find more on this term http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drag_equation"

The solution to this equation is that v\sim\tanh t which converges to a constant value as t goes to infinity i. e. there is a terminal velocity.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top