MHB Projective Algebraic Geometry - Exercise 4(a) Cox et al - Section 8.1

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading the undergraduate introduction to algebraic geometry entitled "Ideals, Varieties and Algorithms: An introduction to Computational Algebraic Geometry and Commutative Algebra (Third Edition) by David Cox, John Little and Donal O'Shea ... ...

I am currently focused on Chapter 8, Section 1: The Projective Plane ... ... and need help getting started with Exercise 4(a) ... Exercise 4 in Section 8.1 reads as follows:https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/5738Can someone please help me with Exercise 4(a) ... ... indeed, what is actually involved in (rigorously) showing that the equation $$x^2 - y^2 = z^2$$ is a well-defined curve in $$\mathbb{P}^2 ( \mathbb{R} )$$ ... but I am very unsure of exactly how this works ... ... Presumably, what is involved is not only (rigorously) showing that the equation $$x^2 - y^2 = z^2$$ is a well-defined curve in $$\mathbb{P}^2 ( \mathbb{R} )$$ but showing that $$x^2 - y^2 = z^2$$ is the representation in $$\mathbb{P}^2 ( \mathbb{R} )$$ of the curve $$x^2 - y^2 = 1$$ in $$\mathbb{R}^2$$ ... ... ?Indeed whatever the meaning of the question, I would like to be able to show that the curve $$x^2 - y^2 = 1$$ in $$\mathbb{R}^2$$ becomes the curve $$x^2 - y^2 = z^2$$ in $$\mathbb{P}^2 ( \mathbb{R} )$$ ... indeed I think this is true ... BUT ... how do you rigorously show this ...

Further I would like to understand the general approach for taking an algebraic curve in $$\mathbb{R}^2$$ and finding the corresponding curve in $$\mathbb{P}^2 ( \mathbb{R} )$$ ... ... BUT ... how is this done ...Hope someone can help ... ...Peter

======================================================================To give readers of the above post some idea of the context of the exercise and also the notation I am providing some relevant text from Cox et al ... ... as follows:https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/5739
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/5740
View attachment 5741
View attachment 5742
View attachment 5743
View attachment 5744
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Peter,

Peter said:
Can someone please help me with Exercise 4(a) ... ... indeed, what is actually involved in (rigorously) showing that the equation $$x^2 - y^2 = z^2$$ is a well-defined curve in $$\mathbb{P}^2 ( \mathbb{R} )$$ ... but I am very unsure of exactly how this works ... ...

Whenever you see "well-defined" in some sort of quotient space it means that you must check that a particular choice of representative element for a member of the quotient is irrelevant at the courser level detail offered by the quotient space.

In exercise 4(a) you must show that if $(x,y,z)$ and $(x',y',z')$ are homogeneous coordinates for the curve $C,$ then they actually described the same curve $C$ in projective space. This is done in a similar fashion to what the authors outline after Definition 3.
Peter said:
Indeed whatever the meaning of the question, I would like to be able to show that the curve $$x^2 - y^2 = 1$$ in $$\mathbb{R}^2$$ becomes the curve $$x^2 - y^2 = z^2$$ in $$\mathbb{P}^2 ( \mathbb{R} )$$ ... indeed I think this is true ... BUT ... how do you rigorously show this ...

Further I would like to understand the general approach for taking an algebraic curve in $$\mathbb{R}^2$$ and finding the corresponding curve in $$\mathbb{P}^2 ( \mathbb{R} )$$ ... ... BUT ... how is this done ...

I believe you can find the answer to your question in the "Plane Projective Curves" section of this Wikipedia entry: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebraic_curve
 
GJA said:
Hi Peter,
Whenever you see "well-defined" in some sort of quotient space it means that you must check that a particular choice of representative element for a member of the quotient is irrelevant at the courser level detail offered by the quotient space.

In exercise 4(a) you must show that if $(x,y,z)$ and $(x',y',z')$ are homogeneous coordinates for the curve $C,$ then they actually described the same curve $C$ in projective space. This is done in a similar fashion to what the authors outline after Definition 3. I believe you can find the answer to your question in the "Plane Projective Curves" section of this Wikipedia entry: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebraic_curve
Thanks GJA ... most helpful ...

Re-reading the relevant part of Cox et al and studying the Wikipedia entry ...

Thanks again,

Peter
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
Back
Top