Proof about commutator bracket

ice109
Messages
1,707
Reaction score
6
i've never really done a proof by induction but i would like to prove a statement about commutator relations so can you please check my proof:

claim: [A,B^n]=nB^{n-1}[A,B] if [A,B]=k\cdot I where A,B are operators, I is the identity and k is any scalar.

proof: [A,B^2] = [A,B]B+B[A,B] = 2B^{2-1}[A,B] where the B is brought out of the commutator by almost obvious identity and the last equality follows from the commutativity of the identity with any operator.

so for n=2 the equality is proven. we now assume that the equality holds for n-2 case and proceed to prove it holds for n case:

[A,B^n]=[A,B^2B^{n-2}]=[A,B^{2}]B^{n-2}+B^2[A,B^{n-2}]
=2B[A,B]B^{n-2}+B^2(n-2)B^{n-3}[A,B]
=2B^{n-1}[A,B]+(n-2)B^{n-1}[A,B]
=nB^{n-1}[A,B]

so how 'bout it? was successful?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think proof by induction goes something like this:

Show that the equality is true for n = 1

Assume the equality is true for n

Then show it is true for n+1
 
it's the same thing?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top