Proof about commutator bracket

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the commutator relation [A,B^n]=nB^{n-1}[A,B] under the condition that [A,B]=k·I, where A and B are operators and I is the identity. The proof utilizes mathematical induction, demonstrating the base case for n=2 and assuming the equality holds for n-2 to prove it for n. The final result confirms that the relation holds true for all integers n, validating the inductive step.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of operator algebra and commutators
  • Familiarity with mathematical induction techniques
  • Knowledge of identity operators in linear algebra
  • Basic concepts of scalar multiplication in operator theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study advanced operator theory, focusing on commutator identities
  • Learn about mathematical induction proofs in abstract algebra
  • Explore the implications of commutator relations in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the role of identity operators in functional analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying quantum mechanics or operator theory will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the properties of commutators and proof techniques in algebra.

ice109
Messages
1,708
Reaction score
6
i've never really done a proof by induction but i would like to prove a statement about commutator relations so can you please check my proof:

claim: [itex][A,B^n]=nB^{n-1}[A,B][/itex] if [itex][A,B]=k\cdot I[/itex] where A,B are operators, I is the identity and k is any scalar.

proof: [tex][A,B^2] = [A,B]B+B[A,B] = 2B^{2-1}[A,B][/tex] where the B is brought out of the commutator by almost obvious identity and the last equality follows from the commutativity of the identity with any operator.

so for n=2 the equality is proven. we now assume that the equality holds for n-2 case and proceed to prove it holds for n case:

[tex][A,B^n]=[A,B^2B^{n-2}]=[A,B^{2}]B^{n-2}+B^2[A,B^{n-2}][/tex]
[tex]=2B[A,B]B^{n-2}+B^2(n-2)B^{n-3}[A,B][/tex]
[tex]=2B^{n-1}[A,B]+(n-2)B^{n-1}[A,B][/tex]
[tex]=nB^{n-1}[A,B][/tex]

so how 'bout it? was successful?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think proof by induction goes something like this:

Show that the equality is true for n = 1

Assume the equality is true for n

Then show it is true for n+1
 
it's the same thing?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K