MHB Proof by induction? No Idea what I should do :(

FriendlyCashew
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
find the general rule and prove by induction

1 = 1
1 - 4 = -(1 + 2)
1 - 4 + 9 = 1 + 2 + 3
1 - 4 + 9 -16 = -(1 + 2 + 3 + 4)

I created this so far, but don't know if I am even going the correct direction

1594666104073.png
 

Attachments

  • 1594666034481.png
    1594666034481.png
    2.7 KB · Views: 99
Physics news on Phys.org
FriendlyCashew said:
find the general rule and prove by induction

1 = 1
1 - 4 = -(1 + 2)
1 - 4 + 9 = 1 + 2 + 3
1 - 4 + 9 -16 = -(1 + 2 + 3 + 4)

I created this so far, but don't know if I am even going the correct direction

View attachment 10459
You have the correct formula, except that $n^n$ should be $n^2$. I think your next step should be to simplify the right side of the formula by using the formula (which you probably know?) for the sum of the numbers $1$ to $n$. After that, you should be able to apply the method of induction.
 
FriendlyCashew said:
find the general rule and prove by induction

1 = 1
1 - 4 = -(1 + 2)
1 - 4 + 9 = 1 + 2 + 3
1 - 4 + 9 -16 = -(1 + 2 + 3 + 4)

I created this so far, but don't know if I am even going the correct direction

View attachment 10459
Actually, I think what you want is
[math]\sum_{n = 1}^k (-1)^{n - 1} n^2 = (-1)^{k + 1} \sum_{n = 1}^k n[/math]

Does this work for some value of k? (Sure, try k = 1.) So if it works for k, does it work for k + 1?

-Dan
 
1594726378767.png

1594726602319.png

1594726753755.png

1594726804881.png


Is this correct?
 
FriendlyCashew said:
find the general rule and prove by induction

1 = 1
1 - 4 = -(1 + 2)
1 - 4 + 9 = 1 + 2 + 3
1 - 4 + 9 -16 = -(1 + 2 + 3 + 4)

I created this so far, but don't know if I am even going the correct direction

View attachment 10459
The equation that you are trying to prove by induction is $$\sum_{n = 1}^k (-1)^{n - 1} n^2 = (-1)^{k + 1} \sum_{n = 1}^k n$$. Your first attempt at this was wrong, and so was mine (sorry about that). But topsquark got it right. The next step is to use the fact that $$ \sum_{n = 1}^k n = \frac12k(k+1)$$. So you want to prove that $$\sum_{n = 1}^k (-1)^{n - 1} n^2 = \frac12(-1)^{k + 1}k(k+1)$$. That equation is true when $k=1$ because both sides are then equal to $1$.

Now suppose that the equation is true for $k$. You want to show that it is also true for $k+1$, namely that $$\sum_{n = 1}^{k+1} (-1)^{n - 1} n^2 = \frac12(-1)^{k + 2}(k+1)(k+2)$$. On the left side of the equation, that differs from the previous equation just by the addition of one extra term $(-1)^k(k+1)^2$. So starting with the known equation $$ \sum_{n = 1}^k (-1)^{n - 1} n^2 = \frac12(-1)^{k + 1}k(k+1)$$, add $(-1)^k(k+1)^2$ to each side to get $$\sum_{n = 1}^{k+1} (-1)^{n - 1} n^2 = \frac12(-1)^{k + 1}k(k+1) + (-1)^k(k+1)^2$$.

Now can you simplify the right side of that equation to complete the proof?
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top