Proof for this Laplace transform

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the Laplace transform of the function t^n, starting with the integral L[t^n] = ∫_0^{∞} t^n e^{-st} dt. The initial approach leads to a recursive relationship involving L[t^{n-1}], suggesting that L[t^n] = (n/s)L[t^{n-1}]. An alternative method using the substitution v=st results in L(t^n) = (1/s^{n+1})Γ(n+1), which simplifies to L(t^n) = n!/s^{n+1}. However, this contradicts the expected result of (n+1)!/s^{n+1}, prompting a verification step using n=1 to clarify the correct formula.
Reshma
Messages
749
Reaction score
6
Can someone help me out with the proof of the Laplace transform of the function tn?

I did have a go at this one.
L[t^n] = \int_0^{\infty} t^n e^{-st}dt

= t^n\frac{-e^{-st}}{s}\vert_0^{\infty} + {1\over s}\int_0^{\infty} nt^{n-1}e^{-st}dt

={n\over s}\int_0^{\infty} t^{n-1}e^{-st}dt

={n\over s}L[t^{n-1}]

I am supposed to arrive at the result:
L[t^n] = \frac{(n+1)!}{s^{n+1}}
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Just an addendum, should I prove this using induction?
 
L(t^{n}) = \int_{0}^{\infty} t^{n}e^{-st}dt

Let v=st to give L(t^{n}) = \frac{1}{s^{n+1}}\int_{0}^{\infty}v^{n}e^{-v}dv = \frac{1}{s^{n+1}}\Gamma(n+1)

\Gamma(n+1) = n!, giving the result L(t^{n}) = \frac{n!}{s^{n+1}}. This isn't what you've got, but check by using n=1 to see whose correct.

L(t) = \int_{0}^{\infty}te^{-st}dt =\left[ \frac{te^{-st}}{-s}\right]_{0}^{\infty} - \int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{-s}e^{-st}dt = \frac{1}{s^{2}}

Hence L(t^{1}) = \frac{1!}{s^{2}}, so the formula you were trying to derive isn't correct.
 
Last edited:
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top